Radovan Semancik wrote:
On 04/30/2015 07:21 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
I think we are too strict here. The OpenLDAP schema contain duplicate AT
declaration that should be fixed (I will fill an ITS for that), but in
any case, it should not be considered as an error by the schema parser.
Well, it is worse than that. I'm past this point now, but as far as I
remember either OpenLDAP or 389ds had the same attribute in both MAY and
MUST,
attributes used syntaxes that were not declared and so on.
Not possible in OpenLDAP, since we do full schema checking. 389DS, like
Sun and other Netscape-derived junk, probably is more careless here.
I've
tried to add all these "quirks" to the relaxed mode. But it ended up
like this:
https://github.com/Evolveum/directory-shared/commit/b941ff690a41cd03b31679759dcf2fb367b1cb83
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
