[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14590405#comment-14590405
]
Stefan Seelmann commented on DIRKRB-293:
----------------------------------------
Thanks Kiran for your thoughts.
I agree with you the option 2 doesn't make sense and option 1 is the better
solution.
However (if I understand correctly) Kerby needs to store additional data like
"kvnos" and there is no such attribute within the krb5 schema. If that is
really the case then I'd suggest a 3rd option and define a ne "kerby" schema.
> Implementing doUpdateIdentity for LdapIdentityBackend
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRKRB-293
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-293
> Project: Directory Kerberos
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Xu Yaning
> Assignee: Xu Yaning
> Attachments: DIRKRB-293-v1.patch, DIRKRB-293-v2.patch
>
>
> Impelment {{doUpdateIdentity}} for {{LdapIdentityBackend}} to update an
> identity.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
