Le 14/07/15 12:12, Pierre Smits a écrit : > Hi all, > > <quote>And a good LDAP API should support even bad servers</quote> > > Is that an achievable goal? Crappy servers pose so many exceptions to the > rule, that any project, trying to realise a client solution, will > eventually find that has shot itself in the foot. Of course, no one can > argue with a contributor scratching his own itch. But shouldn't this be > done in a separate dev branch, so that trunk isn't affected until such an > integration is tried, tested and accepted? There are not that many LDAP servers out there we need to support : - ApacheDS - OpenLDAP - i389 - AD - IDS - OID - OpenDS
My take is that most of them are pretty complients, except afor a few things that are not correctly implemented.
