Le 14/07/15 12:54, Ludovic Poitou a écrit : > From: Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> > Reply: Apache Directory Developers List <[email protected]>> > Date: 14 Jul 2015 at 11:39:13 > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>> > Subject: Re: 389 Directory Server support in API > > Le 14/07/15 10:49, Radovan Semancik a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> In rev.1690876 I've committed a couple of changes to support 389ds in >> API. >> >> Firstly is looks like 389ds does not respond to base search of root >> DSE unless the attributes are specified explicitly (* or + does not >> work). So I've added support for this. > Good to know. 389ds is known to be a crappy LDAP server, this is one > more proof... > > > Actually, it is compliant with the LDAP RFC. > The attributes in the root DSE are operational, thus must be requested > explicitly. ‘*’ only applies to regular attributes. > ‘+’ is defined in an extension RFC (3673) but not part of the LDAPv3 > standards series (RFC4510).
Damn, you are right... My bad :/
