Le 29/06/16 à 00:20, Stefan Seelmann a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> here is a vote on a new Studio release.
Testing it atm. A few remarks :
* on Mac OSX, there is an issue with the JVM. Since Apple totally fucked
up and decided to not provide anymore a JVM, we have an issue when
starting Studio. We get a message like "The JVM shared library does not
contain the JNI_CreateJavaVM symbol". This can be fixed by tuning the
ApacheDirectoryStudio.app/Contents/Info.plist file, like :
<array>
<!-- to use a specific Java version (instead of the platform's
default) uncomment one of the following options,
or add a VM found via
$/usr/libexec/java_home -V
<string>-vm</string>
<string>/System/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.6.0.jdk/Contents/Commands/java</string>
-->
<!-- The following line has been uncomented and the path to the
existing JVM added -->
<string>-vm</string>
<string>/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_60.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java</string>
<string>-keyring</string>
<string>~/.eclipse_keyring</string>
<string>-showlocation</string>
</array>
This is obviously a real pain in the neck. I think we can get it fixed
but I don't see how. As soon as we have installers, plus a part in teh
README telling users how to build the installers, we can simply ignore
this issue (but it should be documented in teh README and on the web site)
* The place where the produced packages are put is not correct :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/directory/studio/2.0.0.v20160628-M11/2.0.0.v20160628-M11/
instead of
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/directory/studio/2.0.0.v20160628-M11/.
Not such a big deal, it can be fixed for the next build.
* We don't have the installers to test. Packages for all the platforms
we suport should be created (.dmg, .deb, .exe, .rpm). I have created the
DMG following the README in the /tools/Mac OS X DMG/README doco, I think
creating all the other installers should be part of the release being
voted. Note that the installer works well, and teh version it installs
doe snot have teh same problem I faced upper.
* The copyright licence on the logo is from 2006-2015. It should be 2016.
* The Notice.txt file has an outdated header too : "Apache Directory
Studio Copyright 2007-2014 The Apache Software Foundation"
* The LICENSE.txt file needs a serious review :
- there are mixed license between nlog4j and slf4j :
"Apache Directory Studio bundles a copy of SLF4J API Module, which is
distributed under the
following license:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NLOG4J License
Copyright (c) 2004-2006 SLF4J.ORG
Copyright (c) 2004-2006 QOS.ch
"
- we should include the license for slf4j
(http://www.slf4j.org/license.html).
Bottom line, all works, but I can't give it a +1 due to those
annoyances. I can help to get some of those fixed, but feel free to
comment first.
thanks a lot fo the hard work, Stefan !
