> On Sep 22, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Steve Moyer <smo...@psu.edu> wrote:
> So ... what other categories of classes would be useful? The Apache
> Directory project obviously maintains code that performs the same functions -
> wouldn't it be nice if the JDK itself took over some of the low-level
> protocol code (especially where it already exists). If we collect a list in
> this email thread I'd be happy to pass it along.
I’m probably reaching here but how about a deprecation of jndi for the apache
ldap api? This would require a decoupling of its naming from the directory
features which should be doable with the jigsaw.