> On Sep 22, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Steve Moyer <smo...@psu.edu> wrote:
> So ... what other categories of classes would be useful?  The Apache 
> Directory project obviously maintains code that performs the same functions - 
> wouldn't it be nice if the JDK itself took over some of the low-level 
> protocol code (especially where it already exists).  If we collect a list in 
> this email thread I'd be happy to pass it along.

I’m probably reaching here but how about a deprecation of jndi for the apache 
ldap api?  This would require a decoupling of its naming from the directory 
features which should be doable with the jigsaw.


Reply via email to