Thanks for helping guide Gris.  She's just learning about how things
work at the ASF.

On 6/10/2019 4:48 PM, Naomi Slater wrote:
> hey folks,
>
> two things that have happened in the past couple of days that concern me
>
> the first is that a board report was prepared and sent to the board by the
> Chair without any input from the committee. (Gris acknowledged this a
> separate follow-up email she sent to dev@diversity)
>
> SIDE NOTE: I am subscribed to board@ but I didn't receive the original copy
> of the board report. so I am wondering which list it was sent to. perhaps I
> have a misconfigured email client?
>
> ANOTHER SIDE NOTE: it is generally a good idea to copy dev@ when sending
> the report to board@. that way, there is no need to send an additional
> followup notification to dev@diversity
>
> my second concern is that I learned about a proposed D&I budget request
> only because Jim copied in the private@diversity list on a thread that
> seems to have been started on opperations@ (to which I am not subscribed)
>
> we had a brainstorming thread about our budget request last month, but to
> the best of my knowledge, there has been no chance for the committee to
> work on the actual proposal that was sent. I have seen no emails about it,
> no draft text, no requests for review, etc
>
> as far PMCs are concerned, Chairs (who also serve as the VP of the
> respective project) are not "project leaders". they function as an elected
> representative of the committee to the board and are responsible for
> foundation-level admin but they do not hold any special decision-making
> power above-and-beyond a regular committee member
>
> cf. https://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#chair
>
> we are not a PMC, though. so I am not sure how things are meant to operate
> with this committee. (this is one of the reasons I suggested that we draft
> some bylaws that would clarify this sort of thing)
>
> I think that we should operate the way that a standard PMC does. that is,
> decisions are made on-list, *by the committee*, and the Chair (i.e., VP
> D&I) has the primary function of interfacing with the board
>
> apologies, Gris, if we're on the same page and these were both just
> procedural oversights!! most new committees have teething troubles and
> there's no reason we should be any different. but I figure this is an
> important issue and one we should get clarity on as early as possible
>

-- 
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171

Reply via email to