Resending with the correct subject line. Please respond to this thread, not the previous one.
- Sam Ruby On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 3:20 PM Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: > > We've had a number of discussions on a number of lists. This email is > part one of three of my attempts to untangle the discussions. > > Early indications are that the committee is interested in proposing a > pilot Outreachy program (disagree? comment on this thread: [1]), and > that the board will require that the initial pilot be limited to > projects that support the ASF's mission and are not competitive products > in their own right. So things like Gump and Whimsy and Infrastructure > and ComDev and Labs and perhaps Incubator. (disagree? comment on this > thread [2]). Another potential constraint is to limit the budget > approval to the amount of targeted donations received. > > Does the committee view those constraints as workable? And if so, does > the committee have ideas on projects. > > One project proposed in whimsy incubator support for developing and > reviewing incubator reports (modeled loosely as an open to all > committers version of the board agenda tool). Does the committee view > this as a reasonable project given the constraints described above? > > Are there other proposals? > > The scope of this thread is limited to presuming that there is interest > in an Outreachy pilot and that the eventual board constraints are as > described above. Everything else is out of scope for this thread, and > should be pursued in a separate thread. > > - Sam Ruby > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a02217bcc050fe713d33fe73fa14503c173db92a1e1a6c0b174a338c@%3Cdev.diversity.apache.org%3E > > [2] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2b1a92dbbd6b59b430dfd071907d8dc942d5bab6ebb4b318c43a1a5e@%3Cboard.apache.org%3E
