Hey Ted, This is good. I've adjusted it slightly and entered it in the draft. This draft is intended as an instruction set for moderators. Moderators who should be working towards the goals you outlined. All of my adjustments were to that context.
Thank you, Myrle On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:45 PM Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > I think those are very nice guidelines. > > I would recommend a mission statement in the form of a paragraph at the > beginning of the guidelines. Something along the lines of: > > These guidelines are intended to improve the ability of the participants of > this list to hear from as many participants as possible without preventing > anyone from having their say. To that end, these guidelines should be > considered a success if more people are willing to participate in > discussions even if a some individuals are asked to hold back. These > guidelines should be considered a failure if they are used to completely > silence any person or point of view that is relevant to the topics for this > mailing list. Suggestions for improving these guidelines are welcome. > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:05 PM Myrle Krantz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > We've started a discussion on the first draft of some moderation > guidelines > > on private@diversity, and after a couple of short rounds, we decided it > > would be more appropriate to discuss here on the public list. > > > > The document in question is already public here: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EDI/Draft+moderation+guidelines > > > > This is a very early draft, that has mostly been the results of > > improvisational moderating. Your feedback is quite welcome. > > > > Anyone who's already made comments on the private list is welcome to move > > them here. I'm going to skip it with mine for a little bit, not because > I > > feel the need to hide them, but because I'm quite tired, and I need to > get > > some other stuff done. > > > > : o), > > Myrle > > >
