I like it. I think this clarifies it a bit. Thanks, Craig!

On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 09:58, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think that it would be good for the diversity team to consider how a PMC
> might approach the Outreachy Mentor discussion.
>
> Someone in the PMC needs to be willing and able to provide mentorship.
> This is pretty clear from the materials already provided.
>
> The PMC needs to be aware and supportive of the Mentor and subsequent
> mentorship. What that means in practical terms is that the PMC thinks that
> the mentorship will produce something meaningful, and if the mentorship
> creates a useful result, the PMC will support committers to incorporate the
> product of the mentorship in a useful way. That is, will accept pull
> requests/patches from the mentorship.
>
> The above is how PMCs usually operate. Someone proposes an idea for a new
> feature/ doc/ test/ web site/ etc and socializes it on the dev list.
> Discussion ensues. The proposer eventually is satisfied that the idea has
> merit and announces the result on the dev list.
>
> The exact mechanism by which a PMC accepts an idea to be incorporated into
> the project is very PMC-specific. But I'd say that The Apache Way would at
> minimum require a discussion on the dev list about the proposed Mentor and
> the idea to be implemented by the mentorship.
>
> Circling back to the original question: Perhaps we can clarify item 4
> "       • Get consensus from your project’s PMC about the previous points
> and move to the next step. This would usually involve a discussion on the
> dev list about the proposed project, resulting in lazy consensus to
> proceed."
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig
>
> > On Aug 23, 2019, at 4:28 AM, Shane Curcuru <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Awasum Yannick wrote on 2019-8-23 2:36AM EDT:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> Anyone on the PMC just needs to confirm that the mentor/committer has
> the
> >> support and backing of the PMC to do Outreachy.
> >
> > Putting it in Apache terms, there are two questions Awasum is asking
> > above, which each need some thought:
> >
> > - Is the PMC aware, and providing at least Lazy Consensus that they
> > don't mind if the volunteer mentor is working with Outreachy on their
> > project?  That should be pretty easy, unless the PMC has specific
> > concerns about the mentor's behavior.
> >
> > This is required IMO, and we could make the doc more clear by specifying
> > lazy consensus [1].  (OK, that part is pretty easy)
> >
> > - Are other PMC members committing to support and actively assist the
> > mentor in their work on Outreachy?  I.e. not just regular PMC work of
> > reviewing patches in general, but are (at least some) other PMC members
> > willing to step up as backup mentor if the volunteer mentor is away
> > temporarily?
> >
> > This is a much more complicated question.  It all depends on the
> > volunteer mentor's time and reliability to start with.  It feels like
> > this is a key question for Apache projects and Outreachy: does Outreachy
> > expect the *whole* project leadership to be active (in some way) at
> > helping the intern, or just the specific named volunteer mentor(s)?
> >
> > --
> >
> > - Shane
> >  Director & Member
> >  The Apache Software Foundation
> >
> >
> > [1] https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html
> >
> >> This is just to make sure a mentor is not rogue and to avoid confusion
> in
> >> case a mentor is not able to attend to an intern, then the PMC will be
> able
> >> to step in and replace that committer. (Just one instance)
> >>
> >>
> >> Hope this helps.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019, 02:59 Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have a couple people waiting for "PMC consensus" based on item 4 from
> >>>
> >>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EDI/2019/08/19/Seeking+volunteer+mentors+from+all+Apache+projects+to+help+mentor+under-represented+contributors
> >>> .
> >>>
> >>> I am not really sure what this entails, or whether the PMC really
> needs to
> >>> approve anything. Is there something specific in mind? (apologies if I
> >>> missed the thread or FAQ and failed to find the info)
> >>>
> >>> Kenn
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> Craig L Russell
> [email protected]
>
> --
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to