Could you clarify who would be prohibited from public statements by this?
Historically, rules requiring confidentiality have been used to restrict
victims of harassment from talking publicly about incidents. That has
let harassment and assault continue by preventing discovery of a pattern
of behavior with multiple victims.
On 11/9/2019 4:55 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I don't know the details on the circumstances here, but it seems to me that
the point of "public accusations" should constitute harassment in and of
itself. Do we make that explicit?
// Niclas
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 8:19 AM Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
This is just Uncle Bob being reactionary. What else is new?
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 14:28 Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> wrote:
Yeah just bringing it for others to loop in.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019, 15:26 Sally Khudairi <[email protected]> wrote:
Quite a bit of activity about this on Twitter yesterday...
- - -
Vice President Marketing & Publicity
Vice President Sponsor Relations
The Apache Software Foundation
Tel +1 617 921 8656 | [email protected]
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019, at 15:18, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
https://blog.cleancoder.com/uncle-bob/2019/11/08/OpenLetterLinuxFoundation.html
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
--
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
