Patricia,
I think Ross said it well.
Just because I saw someone commit murder, doesn't give me the right to beat
(or hang, or incite others to do) the perpetrator and fair trial is still a
necessity in our civilized society. Lynching is (I hoped) a thing of the
past. I am not willing to give up the basic pillars of our society, just
because someone was offended, or even hurt. Sorry, but to me, the principle
of "rather let a murderer go free, than risk convict an innocent" is still
a strong one. But lately, it seems to no longer be the case.

With all due respect
Niclas

On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 2:48 PM Ross Gardler
<[email protected]> wrote:

> IN THIS MAIL I AM ATTEMPTING TO DIG DEEPER THAN THE SURFACE. I AM NOT
> ATTEMPTING TO MAKE ANY JUDGEMENT ON ANY SPECIFIC OPINION OR SITUATION. I
> BEG THAT PEOPLE DON'T TRY TO READ BETWEEN THE LINES. IF SOMETHING SEEMS
> "OFF" IN SOME WAY PLEASE ASK FOR CLARIFICATION.
>
> Historically rules of confidentiality have also protected the innocent
> from false accusations and trial by media.
>
> It's very hard to find the right balance. How might the ASF best handle a
> situation like this?
>
> Ross
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Patricia Shanahan <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2019 6:18:52 PM
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: FYI
>
> Could you clarify who would be prohibited from public statements by this?
>
> Historically, rules requiring confidentiality have been used to restrict
> victims of harassment from talking publicly about incidents. That has
> let harassment and assault continue by preventing discovery of a pattern
> of behavior with multiple victims.
>
> On 11/9/2019 4:55 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > I don't know the details on the circumstances here, but it seems to me
> that
> > the point of "public accusations" should constitute harassment in and of
> > itself. Do we make that explicit?
> >
> > // Niclas
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 8:19 AM Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> This is just Uncle Bob being reactionary. What else is new?
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 14:28 Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yeah just bringing it for others to loop in.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019, 15:26 Sally Khudairi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Quite a bit of activity about this on Twitter yesterday...
> >>>>
> >>>> - - -
> >>>> Vice President Marketing & Publicity
> >>>> Vice President Sponsor Relations
> >>>> The Apache Software Foundation
> >>>>
> >>>> Tel +1 617 921 8656 | [email protected]
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019, at 15:18, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblog.cleancoder.com%2Funcle-bob%2F2019%2F11%2F08%2FOpenLetterLinuxFoundation.html&amp;data=02%7C01%7CRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7C3fd9ab83d1884f6c043a08d765846506%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637089491620296831&amp;sdata=z3qcdMSTYuHeaLivL6ooPBUjYeZDTPqICIIlfihZpCE%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Kevin A. McGrail
> >>>>> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> >>>>> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> >>>>>
> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fkmcgrail&amp;data=02%7C01%7CRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7C3fd9ab83d1884f6c043a08d765846506%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637089491620296831&amp;sdata=iw2%2F9S7KS%2BWm3eUzvpMTvuH3%2Fs3MoxEcK6aMQwnxG%2BU%3D&amp;reserved=0
> - 703.798.0171
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>
> >
> >
>


-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java

Reply via email to