Letś get a little history.
History is written by the winners. What level of objectivity you are
considered to have when writting as the co-lead of the documentation ?
Besides, who cares about the past when the project welcomes new comers
every second from all around the world ?
Daniel found working with the documentation
project too difficult so he proposed an off-site way, oooauthors, that
would make production of documentation easier and that this project
would feed the main documentation project. He also promised that this
would result in a user guide. Well we actually got a user guide but
only
after the doc project published one. So much for that.
So what ? What point are you trying to make ? That oooauthors was ...
late ?
THere was also a promise of a printed guide. Again this has not
occurred
via oooauthors; however, the documentation project has this in place
and
further proceeds from the sale of this guide go directly to
OpenOffice.org.
Very good. So what ? And how many books sales proceeds do not go to OOo
?
Are you just trying to show off ? What is your point here ?
SO if you want to complain about progress or lack thereof at the doc
project or any of the NL projects, get involved with OpenOffice.org and
not a third party project that seems bent on undermining on-going
efforts.
I don't know who's undermining what. Wasting time on bickering is not
generally considered productive. And for some reason it seems bickering
on "fork" issues seems to be a OOo lead hobby.
If your way of considering participation is "you're with us or shut up"
I fear you won't attract a lot of people.
The mail that started it all today was not productive. If that's the
real OOo way then no wonder you're getting forked.
JC Helary
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
