On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 07:10 -0400, Walter A. March wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > <snip> > > Just a comment. I do wish that there was more effort in producing > > content than in playing proof reader. In this case it was warranted as I > > had guests and did not take the extra time needed to fully check. Don't > > you, as members of the project, think that making the effort to create > > content is worthwhile? Puzzled. > > content creation is why I am here. I still feel a little new! As far as > the content creation you are talking about, I guess we should check the > issue list and look at the projects there? BTW, I take it P5 is higher > priority than P2? >
Other way around. P1 is highest and descends. And I am very aware of your efforts Walter. Thanks. > any other places to check? > > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6268 OO,o for MSO users > hasn't been touched in 2.5 years... I just left a job where I helped MSO > users and wrote how-tos for them for four years. I'd love to take a look > at this issue but I don't know if it is dead. I think the docs refer > back to OO.o 1.x > Well it is the doc projects for sure. However, the OOoAuthors folk have produced an excellent Migration document that has sort of superseded the need to pursue 6268. Nonetheless review it to see if it could be a quick reference like a card. Now that might be a good thing. You decide. About your request about indexing. I have not decided, yet, whether to pursue it or not. If you are really keen contact me off list and issue. > wanting to help, > WalterAM > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
