G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
Hmm. Do you not think that this document and your comments are better
suited to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? We have gone to a
online_help is so fresh that it probably doesn't make sense
to discuss that there since there is noone subscribed to it.
So please use dev and online_help for discussion.
He, he. Not so fresh that it elicited a response :-) In any case, it
seems to me that the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list would
have been better. Remember not every member is on a high speed
connection so attachments can be problematic.
Well, ok. I agree that attachments may be a problem. That's why we
should use the website to publish these (thanks, Gerry, for taking
this burden).
So would I. However, I think you are making an assumption that everyone
is interested. My experience tells me otherwise so we use the
documentation project as a umbrella to gather together those who can
help in some way. Doing so allows others more interested in user level
creations such as HOW-TOs and guides to concentrate their efforts in
their area of choice.
Make sense?
Well, sort of ;-)
Let me put it that way: everything regarding online help content
and structure should go on online_help, if it comes to online help
as being part of the documentation strategy it should go to dev.
Since all is done, I will take the time to prepare your document for
presentation on the webpages.
I don't understand that.
Now I do.
I apologize if this message breaks threading as the Reply-To of the
original pointed to some Sun newsserver.
Mmmh, we have some mail2news gateway set up here so maybe that's
making trouble. Is this reply better?
Frank
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
