On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 11:43 +0200, Frank Peters wrote: > G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > >>> Hmm. Do you not think that this document and your comments are better > >>> suited to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? We have gone to a > >> online_help is so fresh that it probably doesn't make sense > >> to discuss that there since there is noone subscribed to it. > >> So please use dev and online_help for discussion. > > > > He, he. Not so fresh that it elicited a response :-) In any case, it > > seems to me that the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list would > > have been better. Remember not every member is on a high speed > > connection so attachments can be problematic. > > Well, ok. I agree that attachments may be a problem. That's why we > should use the website to publish these (thanks, Gerry, for taking > this burden). > > > So would I. However, I think you are making an assumption that everyone > > is interested. My experience tells me otherwise so we use the > > documentation project as a umbrella to gather together those who can > > help in some way. Doing so allows others more interested in user level > > creations such as HOW-TOs and guides to concentrate their efforts in > > their area of choice. > > > Make sense? > > Well, sort of ;-) > Let me put it that way: everything regarding online help content > and structure should go on online_help, if it comes to online help > as being part of the documentation strategy it should go to dev. > > >>> Since all is done, I will take the time to prepare your document for > >>> presentation on the webpages. > >> I don't understand that. > > Now I do. > > > I apologize if this message breaks threading as the Reply-To of the > > original pointed to some Sun newsserver. > > Mmmh, we have some mail2news gateway set up here so maybe that's > making trouble. Is this reply better? >
Yes, thank you. Now no need to remember to Reply-All. -- G. Roderick Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
