On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 16:15 +0200, Andre Schnabel wrote: > Hi, > > G. Roderick Singleton schrieb: > > Please see http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-licensing.html > > I think this will answer your question. > > No -this does not answer any question. The wiki has been established > without any licensing restrictions. Louis added refernce to LGPL and > the OOo site licensing FAQ months after contributons had been done. See > issue 73421 > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73421 > > > > BTW, why would you think that > > licensing would be different for the wiki? > > Because it is an external site and had no licensing restrictions when it > started. > > Don't get me wrong - I'd leike to see all our documentations under > licenses that are compatible. So the licensing terms for OOo source and > documentations need to be considered. But there should be a place to > collect materials that do not (perfectly) fit to our licenses. If we do > not have such a place, these materials will be lost. >
Fine. I guess the wiki is just a techie amusement then for those that cannot abide by the project requirements. The documentation project is obliged to honour the licenses as I pointed out; so anything on the wiki cannot be integrated into the project without a lot of hassle. This is sad but ... -- G. Roderick Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
