On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 16:15 +0200, Andre Schnabel wrote: > Hi, > > G. Roderick Singleton schrieb: > > Please see http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/faq-licensing.html > > I think this will answer your question. > > No -this does not answer any question. The wiki has been established > without any licensing restrictions. Louis added refernce to LGPL and > the OOo site licensing FAQ months after contributons had been done. See > issue 73421 > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73421 > > > > BTW, why would you think that > > licensing would be different for the wiki? > > Because it is an external site and had no licensing restrictions when it > started. > > Don't get me wrong - I'd leike to see all our documentations under > licenses that are compatible. So the licensing terms for OOo source and > documentations need to be considered. But there should be a place to > collect materials that do not (perfectly) fit to our licenses. If we do > not have such a place, these materials will be lost. > > André
Further, as a member of the CC I recommend that you implement the changes necessary so that the documentation project can use material generated on the wiki. In the meantime, we are stuck with the current set of imposed restrictions. -- G. Roderick Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenOffice.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
