Hi Andreas,

- The wiki is already there and presents an easy way for everyone
   to contribute. It's inside the OOo domain and hopefully
   in the future we will be able to use some federated
   identity approach so an OOo member can use one set
   of credentials to login everywhere.


I think there would be also no problem to do that with plone. If you want to contribute to the wiki you had to register: nothing different to plone. In plone you are able to set different rules for publication. In the wiki i don't see actual this posibility (that's normal for a wiki).

Yes, the vanilla wiki does not allow for that. Here, publication
equals authoring.

- The plone instance would be yet another access point
   for users to get documentation unless we just use plone
   to localize and then transfer back. The wiki is currently
   not maintained by us (docs project) so we need not worry
   spending maintenenace resources for it.
   Leaving the wiki completely is a bad idea IMO. I am a wikophile :-)


Wiki is a good and quick tool to develop ideas and to organize work in groups. It is also fine to get informations together. But it's in in my opinion not the best framework to organize high-value documentation (because of it's name, that means quick-quick) ;-)

I agree that for some documentation, there would need to be
a framework behind the wiki that allows for publication
(aggregate wiki pages to form a book, output to ODF for
editing, etc). I would like to put that framework behind
the wiki, since collaboration is so darn easy (but I think I
said that before :-) Also, some documentation can surely
stay on the wiki without having to have a publication
framework (FAQs, little howtos, etc).

- Switching languages in the wiki should be an easy thing
   provided we agree on one common schema:
   o the localized pages sit in a defined hierarchy so URLs
     to switch languages are easily generated automatically
   o the localized pages need to have the same names. With the
     new MW version (which we currently test and hopefully
     implement soon) it will be possible to still use localized
     *titles* to show up. Just the URL is the same (except for
     the language identifier).

That's very easy to organize in plone. The contributor has not to be aware about the URL: that's a task of the framework.

   That's about all we need. If we implement a language bar
   as template a user would be able to
   o switch to another language with one click

In plone always there ;-)

I actually haven't spotted that in my first visit (but the visit
was short, I admit).

   o instantly see if a localization is available or not, and if
     not, start localizing right away
   o add languages easily by just adding them to the template


In plone there is a translation framework insde (no need to add templates manually). You are able to translate to every supported language (I don't know, which of our languages are not supported.).

- Building a localization (and publication) framework around
   mediawiki would be an interesting thing to do and others
   using mediawiki may benefit from that.


May be. But I don't think, if we have enough resources to do that.

Of course, since it's you guys doing the actual work :-),
it's you to make the call, but from a users perspective,
I think, extending the wiki is the better option.


I think we should use a tool, that make it easy to contribute. My experience with the wiki is the following: It's not difficult to contribute text to the wiki. But if you want to contribute text with tables, images etc. it's very difficult to format it in a good looking way.

Yes, that is a valid point.

If I do the same in plone, I get my work done in less than the half of the time.

You are used to using Plone. New users would need to get accustomed
to it. I promise to play more with Plone, maybe we can actually make
use of it at a later date. For now, I think we're stuck with the wiki
and work around that.

Frank

--
Frank Peters
Documentation Project Co-Lead

The OOo Documentation Project:
SIGN UP - PARTICIPATE - CONTRIBUTE
IT'S FREE! NO OBLIGATIONS!
http://documentation.openoffice.org
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to