T. J. Frazier wrote:
Clayton wrote:
T. J. Frazier wrote:
* What's with the redlink category, "PDL License"? (Strange things all
over.)
The red link on any category just means that someone has not yet added a
description to that category. In this case, the PDL License category
probably should have something like the contents of the actual PDL
license, or better yet, a short description of the category and a link
to the PDL License Wiki page.
C.
Sounds like one sentence plus the template (which has the link). I think
I can manage that, at least when the wiki comes back up. /tj/
OK, done, but I added the link by hand, instead of just adding the
template to the new page. The license template(s) add the page to the
category. Doing that to a category page, IIRC, is a wiki no-no.
My natural instinct is to dig into the License and Usage templates, so
that they generate a parameter for their offspring to use, something
like "CatPage" or "NoCat", which would:
(a) produce documentation on the child template's page;
(b) have documentation on the Usage page;
(c) when used, as {{license-name|CatPage}} on the Category page, would:
(1) not add the Category page to the category, and
(2) add a fixed statement like, "Pages are placed in this category by
the {{license-name}} template."
The idea is to simplify adding a license, but: would I just be adding to
the complexity, and really making things harder, by doing this?
--
T. J. Frazier
Melbourne, FL
(TJFrazier on OO.o)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@documentation.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@documentation.openoffice.org
