On 06/07/2018 07:13 AM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 02:31:26PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
[...]
@@ -1886,6 +1888,15 @@ virtio_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
                        (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) |
                        (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6);
+ if (tx_offloads & (DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
+                               DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM))
+               req_features |= (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM);

Hmm.. I still prefer to keep the DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM
and DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM aligned to make the coding
style consistent with the existing code of Rx:

1901 ¦       if (rx_offloads & (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
1902 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM))
1903 ¦       ¦       req_features |= (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM);

But it's up to you.

Yes, it is better to keep same alignment, even if the rx one looks a bit
weird to me.

Also, I take the opportunity to switch UDP and TXP CKSUM defines for
consistency with Rx.

+
+       if (tx_offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO)
+               req_features |=
+                       (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO4) |
+                       (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_TSO6);
+
        /* if request features changed, reinit the device */
        if (req_features != hw->req_guest_features) {
                ret = virtio_init_device(dev, req_features);
@@ -1955,6 +1966,12 @@ virtio_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
                           DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM))
                hw->use_simple_rx = 0;
+ if (tx_offloads & (DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
+                               DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
+                               DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO |
+                               DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT))
+               hw->use_simple_tx = 0;

Ditto. Below is the code for Rx:

1987 ¦       if (rx_offloads & (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
1988 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
1989 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO |
1990 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP))
1991 ¦       ¦       hw->use_simple_rx = 0;

So, instead of:

1987 ¦       if (rx_offloads & (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
1988 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
1989 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO |
1990 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP))
1991 ¦       ¦       hw->use_simple_rx = 0;
1992
1993 ¦       if (tx_offloads & (DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
1994 ¦       ¦       ¦       ¦       DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
1995 ¦       ¦       ¦       ¦       DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO |
1996 ¦       ¦       ¦       ¦       DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT))
1997 ¦       ¦       hw->use_simple_tx = 0;

I would prefer:

1987 ¦       if (rx_offloads & (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
1988 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
1989 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_LRO |
1990 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP))
1991 ¦       ¦       hw->use_simple_rx = 0;
1992
1993 ¦       if (tx_offloads & (DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_UDP_CKSUM |
1994 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM |
1995 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO |
1996 ¦       ¦       ¦          DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_INSERT))
1997 ¦       ¦       hw->use_simple_tx = 0;

But anyway, it's up to you. :)

Yep, I fix it now.

Reviewed-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei....@intel.com>

Thanks,
Maxime
Best regards,
Tiwei Bie

Reply via email to