Hi Sharaf,
On 06/27/2018 03:51 PM, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
Tuesday, June 26, 2018 4:39 PM, Ferruh Yigit:
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] testpmd: add forwarding mode to
simulate a noisy neighbour
On 6/26/2018 1:17 PM, Shahaf Shuler wrote:
HI Maxime, Jens
Saturday, June 23, 2018 11:09 AM, Maxime Coquelin:
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] testpmd: add forwarding mode to
simulate a noisy neighbour
From: Jens Freimann <jfreim...@redhat.com>
This adds a new forwarding mode to testpmd to simulate more realistic
behavior of a guest machine engaged in receiving and sending packets
performing Virtual Network Function (VNF).
I really like the idea of adding application w/ more realistic behavior to the
DPDK tree in order to use them in the non-regression cycle.
I am just wondering if putting it as another forward engine in testpmd is
the right place for it.
Hi Shahaf,
This was the request in old review comments. As you said it is good to have
more realistic behavior but also we would like to test/use io forwarding, so
new forwarding engine is way of having both two.
Sorry, I missed reading the previous comments.
As I said, there are upsides and downsides to it. I still think it deserve a
separate example but we can start inside testpmd and move it to other location
when needed.
I get your point, but I think it is better to have it in testpmd as we
intend to use it to gather some benchmarks.
And yes, if this is turn out to be problematic, we can move it outside
testpmd at some points.
Thanks for your insights,
Maxime
