11/07/2018 10:41, Gaëtan Rivet: > > > + struct rte_bus *bus; /**< bus handle. */ > > > + struct rte_class *cls; /**< class handle. */ > > > > "class" is more readable than "cls" > > > > I was thinking that maybe this could be a problem when trying to build > with C++. The EAL headers in DPDK are meant to be included in C++ apps, > I think ``class`` would be an issue then.
Yes, right. So only options are "cls" or "devclass". Up to you. > If I'm mistaken, then sure, class is a better name.
