On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 15:50 +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 03:04:38PM +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 14:30 +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:27:01PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:38:09PM +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > > Move libbsd inclusion to librte_eal, so that all other
> > > > > libraries
> > > > > and
> > > > > PMDs will inherit it, and librte_cmdline which is built
> > > > > before
> > > > > librte_eal.
> > > > > Bump Meson dependency to 0.47.1, to avoid bug where the
> > > > > linker
> > > > > flag of
> > > > > the dependency gets replicated again and again.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > v2: bump meson minimum version to 0.47.1 to avoid meson bug,
> > > > > and
> > > > > move
> > > > > libbsd dependency to eal and cmdline
> > > > >
> > > > > config/meson.build | 10 +++++-----
> > > > > lib/librte_cmdline/meson.build | 4 ++++
> > > > > lib/librte_eal/meson.build | 3 +++
> > > > > meson.build | 2 +-
> > > > > 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > There are some meson version checks in the code that can be
> > > > removed
> > > > as
> > > > part of this change:
> > > >
> > > > $ git grep meson.version
> > > > drivers/meson.build: if
> > > > meson.version().version_compare('>=0.47')
> > > > kernel/linux/meson.build: if
> > > > meson.version().version_compare('>=0.44')
> > > > kernel/linux/meson.build: if
> > > > meson.version().version_compare('>=0.44')
> > > > meson.build: meson_version: '>= 0.41'
> > > > meson.build:if meson.version().version_compare('>=0.47')
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thinking on this more, I think the version bump to 0.47 should be
> > > done in a
> > > separate standalone patch at the start of this set. Then the
> > > other
> > > patches
> > > can be based on that.
> > >
> > > /Bruce
> >
> > Ok, will remove those checks in v3 and move the bump to a different
> > patch. I'll put it second, as the first patch is really not related
> > to
> > the version and it's stand-alone (and marked for stable), I was
> > just
> > too lazy to do 2 series :-)
> >
> > --
> > Kind regards,
> > Luca Boccassi
>
> I don't expect the version bump to happen for 19.02, so if you want
> the
> first patch to go into that release, it probably needs to be
> standalone.
>
> /Bruce
Ok, will do that.
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
