From: Igor Romanov <igor.roma...@oktetlabs.ru>

Tx offloads checks should be done in Tx prepare.

Signed-off-by: Igor Romanov <igor.roma...@oktetlabs.ru>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>
---
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h   | 12 +++++++++---
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c |  9 ++++-----
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tso.c     |  9 ---------
 drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c      | 20 ++++++++++----------
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h
index 885094b67..c42d0d01f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_tx.h
@@ -195,7 +195,8 @@ sfc_dp_find_tx_by_caps(struct sfc_dp_list *head, unsigned 
int avail_caps)
 const struct sfc_dp_tx *sfc_dp_tx_by_dp_txq(const struct sfc_dp_txq *dp_txq);
 
 static inline int
-sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(struct rte_mbuf *m)
+sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(struct rte_mbuf *m,
+                          uint32_t tso_tcp_header_offset_limit)
 {
 #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_SFC_EFX_DEBUG
        int ret;
@@ -209,10 +210,15 @@ sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(struct rte_mbuf *m)
                SFC_ASSERT(ret < 0);
                return -ret;
        }
-#else
-       RTE_SET_USED(m);
 #endif
 
+       if (m->ol_flags & PKT_TX_TCP_SEG) {
+               unsigned int tcph_off = m->l2_len + m->l3_len;
+
+               if (unlikely(tcph_off > tso_tcp_header_offset_limit))
+                       return EINVAL;
+       }
+
        return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c
index b317997ca..3d6ba4292 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_tx.c
@@ -320,9 +320,10 @@ sfc_ef10_try_reap(struct sfc_ef10_txq * const txq, 
unsigned int added,
 }
 
 static uint16_t
-sfc_ef10_prepare_pkts(__rte_unused void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
+sfc_ef10_prepare_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
                      uint16_t nb_pkts)
 {
+       struct sfc_ef10_txq * const txq = sfc_ef10_txq_by_dp_txq(tx_queue);
        uint16_t i;
 
        for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
@@ -347,7 +348,8 @@ sfc_ef10_prepare_pkts(__rte_unused void *tx_queue, struct 
rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
                        }
                }
 #endif
-               ret = sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(m);
+               ret = sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(m,
+                               txq->tso_tcp_header_offset_limit);
                if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
                        rte_errno = ret;
                        break;
@@ -378,9 +380,6 @@ sfc_ef10_xmit_tso_pkt(struct sfc_ef10_txq * const txq, 
struct rte_mbuf *m_seg,
        struct rte_mbuf *m_seg_to_free_up_to = first_m_seg;
        bool eop;
 
-       if (unlikely(tcph_off > txq->tso_tcp_header_offset_limit))
-               return EMSGSIZE;
-
        /*
         * Preliminary estimation of required DMA descriptors, including extra
         * descriptor for TSO header that is needed when the header is
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tso.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tso.c
index 2c03c0837..f46c0e912 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tso.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tso.c
@@ -103,18 +103,9 @@ sfc_efx_tso_do(struct sfc_efx_txq *txq, unsigned int idx,
        size_t nh_off = m->l2_len; /* IP header offset */
        size_t tcph_off = m->l2_len + m->l3_len; /* TCP header offset */
        size_t header_len = m->l2_len + m->l3_len + m->l4_len;
-       const efx_nic_cfg_t *encp = efx_nic_cfg_get(txq->evq->sa->nic);
 
        idx += SFC_EF10_TSO_OPT_DESCS_NUM;
 
-       /*
-        * The TCP header must start at most 208 bytes into the frame.
-        * If it starts later than this then the NIC won't realise
-        * it's a TCP packet and TSO edits won't be applied
-        */
-       if (unlikely(tcph_off > encp->enc_tx_tso_tcp_header_offset_limit))
-               return EMSGSIZE;
-
        header_paddr = rte_pktmbuf_iova(m);
 
        /*
diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c
index 16fd220bf..e128bff90 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sfc/sfc_tx.c
@@ -698,15 +698,19 @@ sfc_efx_tx_maybe_insert_tag(struct sfc_efx_txq *txq, 
struct rte_mbuf *m,
 }
 
 static uint16_t
-sfc_efx_prepare_pkts(__rte_unused void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
+sfc_efx_prepare_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
                     uint16_t nb_pkts)
 {
+       struct sfc_dp_txq *dp_txq = tx_queue;
+       struct sfc_efx_txq *txq = sfc_efx_txq_by_dp_txq(dp_txq);
+       const efx_nic_cfg_t *encp = efx_nic_cfg_get(txq->evq->sa->nic);
        uint16_t i;
 
        for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
                int ret;
 
-               ret = sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(tx_pkts[i]);
+               ret = sfc_dp_tx_prepare_pkt(tx_pkts[i],
+                               encp->enc_tx_tso_tcp_header_offset_limit);
                if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
                        rte_errno = ret;
                        break;
@@ -776,14 +780,10 @@ sfc_efx_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf 
**tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
                         */
                        if (sfc_efx_tso_do(txq, added, &m_seg, &in_off, &pend,
                                           &pkt_descs, &pkt_len) != 0) {
-                               /* We may have reached this place for
-                                * one of the following reasons:
-                                *
-                                * 1) Packet header linearization is needed
-                                *    and the header length is greater
-                                *    than SFC_TSOH_STD_LEN
-                                * 2) TCP header starts at more then
-                                *    208 bytes into the frame
+                               /* We may have reached this place if packet
+                                * header linearization is needed but the
+                                * header length is greater than
+                                * SFC_TSOH_STD_LEN
                                 *
                                 * We will deceive RTE saying that we have sent
                                 * the packet, but we will actually drop it.
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to