> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 5:27
> To: gaetan.ri...@6wind.com; Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; Jingjing
> Wu <jingjing...@intel.com>; Bernard Iremonger
> <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] app/testpmd: use port sibling iterator in
> device cleanup
>
> When removing a rte_device on a port-based request, all the sibling ports
> must be marked as closed.
> The iterator loop can be simplified by using the dedicated macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
Tested-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <mellanox.com>
> ---
> app/test-pmd/testpmd.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c index
> 40c873b97..aeaa74c98 100644
> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c
> @@ -2370,9 +2370,7 @@ detach_port_device(portid_t port_id)
> return;
> }
>
> - for (sibling = 0; sibling < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; sibling++) {
> - if (rte_eth_devices[sibling].device != dev)
> - continue;
> + RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV_SIBLING(sibling, port_id) {
> /* reset mapping between old ports and removed device */
> rte_eth_devices[sibling].device = NULL;
> if (ports[sibling].port_status != RTE_PORT_CLOSED) {
> --
> 2.21.0
