On 6/24/2019 8:53 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On 6/24/19 1:37 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 18/06/2019 09:52, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> On 6/10/2019 8:38 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
>>>> checkpatches.sh generates warnings/errors because of a bit different
>>>> coding style in base driver.
>> [...]
>>> Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.
>>>
>>> Fixed following checkpatch warnings while merging:
>> There are a lot more checkpatch warnings in this code.
>> Is it possible to fix the style of the code in the sfc/base directory?
>> Or we prefer to continue with so many checkpatch warnings?
> 
> In short: I'm trying to minimize a number of warnings, but it is not always
> possible. I'll pay even more attention to it in the future.

There are a few known syntax differences between DPDK and sfc/base/*, most of
the warnings are from those,

at least I am OK with them as long as the syntax is consistent in sfc/base/*
which seems the case, I believe this is better than having a mixture of two
different syntax in the code.

Reply via email to