On 4/30/20 1:33 PM, Wisam Jaddo wrote:
> Add flow performance application skeleton.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wisam Jaddo <wis...@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                          |   5 +
>  app/Makefile                         |   1 +
>  app/meson.build                      |   1 +
>  app/test-flow-perf/Makefile          |  26 +++
>  app/test-flow-perf/main.c            | 246 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  app/test-flow-perf/meson.build       |  11 ++
>  app/test-flow-perf/user_parameters.h |  16 ++
>  config/common_base                   |   5 +
>  doc/guides/tools/flow-perf.rst       |  69 ++++++++
>  doc/guides/tools/index.rst           |   1 +
>  10 files changed, 381 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 app/test-flow-perf/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 app/test-flow-perf/main.c
>  create mode 100644 app/test-flow-perf/meson.build
>  create mode 100644 app/test-flow-perf/user_parameters.h
>  create mode 100644 doc/guides/tools/flow-perf.rst
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index d31a809292..b5632c1bf5 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -1504,6 +1504,11 @@ T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net
>  F: app/test-pmd/
>  F: doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/
>  
> +Flow performance tool
> +M: Wisam Jaddo <wis...@mellanox.com>
> +F: app/test-flow-perf
> +F: doc/guides/flow-perf.rst
> +

Shouldn't it be alphabetially sorted? I think by app name.

>  Compression performance test application
>  T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-crypto
>  F: app/test-compress-perf/
> diff --git a/app/Makefile b/app/Makefile
> index 823771c5fc..bd823f3db7 100644
> --- a/app/Makefile
> +++ b/app/Makefile
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_PROC_INFO) += proc-info
>  DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PDUMP) += pdump
>  DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ACL) += test-acl
>  DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_CMDLINE) += test-cmdline
> +DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_TEST_FLOW_PERF) += test-flow-perf
>  DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_FIB) += test-fib
>  DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PIPELINE) += test-pipeline
>  DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IPSEC) += test-sad
> diff --git a/app/meson.build b/app/meson.build
> index 0f7fe94649..e26f5b72f5 100644
> --- a/app/meson.build
> +++ b/app/meson.build
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ apps = [
>       'test-compress-perf',
>       'test-crypto-perf',
>       'test-eventdev',
> +     'test-flow-perf',

I think 'l' goes after 'i'.

>       'test-fib',
>       'test-pipeline',
>       'test-pmd',
> diff --git a/app/test-flow-perf/Makefile b/app/test-flow-perf/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..45b1fb1464
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/app/test-flow-perf/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +# Copyright 2020 Mellanox Technologies, Ltd
> +
> +include $(RTE_SDK)/mk/rte.vars.mk
> +
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_TEST_FLOW_PERF),y)
> +
> +#
> +# library name
> +#
> +APP = flow_perf
> +
> +CFLAGS += -DALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API
> +CFLAGS += -O3
> +CFLAGS += $(WERROR_FLAGS)
> +CFLAGS += -Wno-deprecated-declarations
> +CFLAGS += -Wno-unused-function

Why is unused function warning disabled?

> +
> +#
> +# all source are stored in SRCS-y
> +#
> +SRCS-y += main.c
> +
> +include $(RTE_SDK)/mk/rte.app.mk
> +
> +endif
> diff --git a/app/test-flow-perf/main.c b/app/test-flow-perf/main.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..156b9ef553
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/app/test-flow-perf/main.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> + *
> + * This file contain the application main file
> + * This application provides the user the ability to test the
> + * insertion rate for specific rte_flow rule under stress state ~4M rule/
> + *
> + * Then it will also provide packet per second measurement after installing
> + * all rules, the user may send traffic to test the PPS that match the rules
> + * after all rules are installed, to check performance or functionality after
> + * the stress.
> + *
> + * The flows insertion will go for all ports first, then it will print the
> + * results, after that the application will go into forwarding packets mode
> + * it will start receiving traffic if any and then forwarding it back and
> + * gives packet per second measurement.
> + *
> + * Copyright 2020 Mellanox Technologies, Ltd
> + */
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <inttypes.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <sys/queue.h>
> +#include <netinet/in.h>
> +#include <setjmp.h>
> +#include <stdarg.h>
> +#include <ctype.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <getopt.h>
> +#include <signal.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <assert.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <sys/time.h>
> +
> +
> +#include <rte_eal.h>
> +#include <rte_common.h>
> +#include <rte_malloc.h>
> +#include <rte_ether.h>
> +#include <rte_ethdev.h>
> +#include <rte_mempool.h>
> +#include <rte_mbuf.h>
> +#include <rte_net.h>
> +#include <rte_flow.h>
> +#include <rte_cycles.h>
> +#include <rte_memory.h>

It looks like many-many above headers are actulally unused.
Please, remove unused headers.

> +
> +#include "user_parameters.h"
> +
> +static uint32_t nb_lcores;
> +static struct rte_mempool *mbuf_mp;
> +
> +static void usage(char *progname)
> +{
> +     printf("\nusage: %s", progname);

Is \n missing at the end of format string?

> +}
> +
> +static void
> +args_parse(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> +     char **argvopt;
> +     int opt;
> +     int opt_idx;
> +     static struct option lgopts[] = {
> +             /* Control */
> +             { "help",                       0, 0, 0 },
> +     };
> +
> +     argvopt = argv;
> +
> +     while ((opt = getopt_long(argc, argvopt, "",
> +                             lgopts, &opt_idx)) != EOF) {
> +             switch (opt) {
> +             case 0:
> +                     if (!strcmp(lgopts[opt_idx].name, "help")) {
> +                             usage(argv[0]);
> +                             rte_exit(EXIT_SUCCESS, "Displayed help\n");
> +                     }
> +                     break;
> +             default:
> +                     usage(argv[0]);
> +                     printf("Invalid option: %s\n", argv[optind]);

I think it is more friendly to log errors to stderr and log
invalid option message first before usage.

> +                     rte_exit(EXIT_SUCCESS, "Invalid option\n");
> +                     break;
> +             }
> +     }
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +init_port(void)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +     uint16_t i, j;
> +     uint16_t port_id;
> +     uint16_t nr_ports = rte_eth_dev_count_avail();
> +     struct rte_eth_hairpin_conf hairpin_conf = {
> +                     .peer_count = 1,
> +     };
> +     struct rte_eth_conf port_conf = {
> +             .rxmode = {
> +                     .split_hdr_size = 0,

I think it is not required, since compiler will
do it for you anyway having below initialization.

> +             },
> +             .rx_adv_conf = {
> +                     .rss_conf.rss_hf =
> +                                     ETH_RSS_IP  |
> +                                     ETH_RSS_UDP |

May be it is better to remove ETH_RSS_UDP by default,
since it is less common that RSS for TCP because of
possible fragmentation and packets from the same
stream delivered to different CPU cores.

> +                                     ETH_RSS_TCP,
> +             }
> +     };
> +     struct rte_eth_txconf txq_conf;
> +     struct rte_eth_rxconf rxq_conf;
> +     struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
> +
> +     if (nr_ports == 0)
> +             rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "Error: no port detected\n");

Please, add empty line here to logically separate above
error from pool creation. Right now it looks misleading.

> +     mbuf_mp = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create("mbuf_pool",
> +                                     TOTAL_MBUF_NUM, MBUF_CACHE_SIZE,
> +                                     0, MBUF_SIZE,
> +                                     rte_socket_id());
> +
> +     if (mbuf_mp == NULL)
> +             rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "Error: can't init mbuf pool\n");
> +
> +     for (port_id = 0; port_id < nr_ports; port_id++) {
> +             ret = rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
> +             if (ret != 0)
> +                     rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
> +                                     "Error during getting device (port %u) 
> info: %s\n",

The line looks long. More than 80 symbols.
Please, use just one TAB to indent relative to rte_exit().
It will make the line a bit shorter.

> +                                     port_id, strerror(-ret));
> +
> +             port_conf.txmode.offloads &= dev_info.tx_offload_capa;

Taking into account that txmode.offloads are 0 above,
it looks strange. May be it is added to early in the
patch series?

> +             printf(":: initializing port: %d\n", port_id);
> +             ret = rte_eth_dev_configure(port_id, RXQs + HAIRPIN_QUEUES,
> +                             TXQs + HAIRPIN_QUEUES, &port_conf);

RXQs and TXQs are bad since mixing upper and lower
cases letters is bad. Macros are in upper case typically.
May be RXQ_NUM? Or NR_RXQ (however, it will be very easy
to missread as NR_RXD and vise versa, so not good)?

> +             if (ret < 0)
> +                     rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
> +                                     ":: cannot configure device: err=%d, 
> port=%u\n",

Too long line, decrease indent

> +                                     ret, port_id);
> +
> +             rxq_conf = dev_info.default_rxconf;
> +             rxq_conf.offloads = port_conf.rxmode.offloads;

Same here. Also it should take supported offloads
into account.

> +             for (i = 0; i < RXQs; i++) {
> +                     ret = rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(port_id, i, NR_RXD,
> +                                             rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port_id),
> +                                             &rxq_conf,
> +                                             mbuf_mp);
> +                     if (ret < 0)
> +                             rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
> +                                             ":: Rx queue setup failed: 
> err=%d, port=%u\n",

Too long line, decrease indent

> +                                             ret, port_id);
> +             }
> +
> +             txq_conf = dev_info.default_txconf;
> +             txq_conf.offloads = port_conf.txmode.offloads;

Same here. Also it should take supported offloads
into account.

> +
> +             for (i = 0; i < TXQs; i++) {
> +                     ret = rte_eth_tx_queue_setup(port_id, i, NR_TXD,
> +                                             rte_eth_dev_socket_id(port_id),
> +                                             &txq_conf);
> +                     if (ret < 0)
> +                             rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
> +                                             ":: Tx queue setup failed: 
> err=%d, port=%u\n",

Too long line, decrease indent

> +                                             ret, port_id);
> +             }
> +
> +             ret = rte_eth_promiscuous_enable(port_id);
> +             if (ret != 0)
> +                     rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
> +                                     ":: promiscuous mode enable failed: 
> err=%s, port=%u\n",

Too long line, decrease indent

> +                                     rte_strerror(-ret), port_id);
> +
> +             for (i = RXQs, j = 0; i < RXQs + HAIRPIN_QUEUES; i++, j++) {
> +                     hairpin_conf.peers[0].port = port_id;
> +                     hairpin_conf.peers[0].queue = j + TXQs;
> +                     ret = rte_eth_rx_hairpin_queue_setup(port_id, i,
> +                                                     NR_RXD, &hairpin_conf);
> +                     if (ret != 0)
> +                             rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
> +                                     ":: Hairpin rx queue setup failed: 
> err=%d, port=%u\n",
> +                                     ret, port_id);
> +             }
> +
> +             for (i = TXQs, j = 0; i < TXQs + HAIRPIN_QUEUES; i++, j++) {
> +                     hairpin_conf.peers[0].port = port_id;
> +                     hairpin_conf.peers[0].queue = j + RXQs;
> +                     ret = rte_eth_tx_hairpin_queue_setup(port_id, i,
> +                                                     NR_TXD, &hairpin_conf);
> +                     if (ret != 0)
> +                             rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
> +                                     ":: Hairpin tx queue setup failed: 
> err=%d, port=%u\n",
> +                                     ret, port_id);
> +             }
> +
> +             ret = rte_eth_dev_start(port_id);
> +             if (ret < 0)
> +                     rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE,
> +                             "rte_eth_dev_start:err=%d, port=%u\n",
> +                             ret, port_id);
> +
> +             printf(":: initializing port: %d done\n", port_id);
> +     }
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> +     uint16_t lcore_id;
> +     uint16_t port;
> +     uint16_t nr_ports;
> +     int ret;
> +     struct rte_flow_error error;
> +
> +     nr_ports = rte_eth_dev_count_avail();

Before EAL init? It is defintely unclear.
If it is done by purpose, please, add a comment
to explain why.

> +     ret = rte_eal_init(argc, argv);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "EAL init failed\n");
> +
> +     argc -= ret;
> +     argv += ret;
> +
> +     if (argc > 1)
> +             args_parse(argc, argv);
> +
> +     init_port();
> +
> +     nb_lcores = rte_lcore_count();
> +
> +     if (nb_lcores <= 1)
> +             rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "This app needs at least two cores\n");
> +
> +     RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_SLAVE(lcore_id)
> +
> +     if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(lcore_id) < 0)
> +             break;

Break what? Is it compile tested?

> +
> +     for (port = 0; port < nr_ports; port++) {
> +             rte_flow_flush(port, &error);
> +             rte_eth_dev_stop(port);
> +             rte_eth_dev_close(port);
> +     }
> +     return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/app/test-flow-perf/meson.build b/app/test-flow-perf/meson.build
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..ec9bb3b3aa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/app/test-flow-perf/meson.build
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +# Copyright(c) 2020 Mellanox Technologies, Ltd
> +
> +# meson file, for building this example as part of a main DPDK build.
> +#
> +# To build this example as a standalone application with an already-installed
> +# DPDK instance, use 'make'
> +
> +sources = files(
> +     'main.c',
> +)
> diff --git a/app/test-flow-perf/user_parameters.h 
> b/app/test-flow-perf/user_parameters.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..56ec7f47b5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/app/test-flow-perf/user_parameters.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Claus
> + *
> + * This file will hold the user parameters values
> + *
> + * Copyright 2020 Mellanox Technologies, Ltd
> + */
> +
> +/** Configuration **/
> +#define RXQs 4
> +#define TXQs 4
> +#define HAIRPIN_QUEUES 4

It makes it Mellanox-speicific from the first patch since
only mlx5 supports hairpin queues. Such things should be
specified using parameters from the very beginning.

> +#define TOTAL_MBUF_NUM 32000
> +#define MBUF_SIZE 2048
> +#define MBUF_CACHE_SIZE 512
> +#define NR_RXD  256
> +#define NR_TXD  256
> diff --git a/config/common_base b/config/common_base
> index 14000ba07e..eaaeaaaee2 100644
> --- a/config/common_base
> +++ b/config/common_base
> @@ -1124,3 +1124,8 @@ CONFIG_RTE_APP_CRYPTO_PERF=y
>  # Compile the eventdev application
>  #
>  CONFIG_RTE_APP_EVENTDEV=y
> +
> +#
> +# Compile the rte flow perf application
> +#
> +CONFIG_RTE_TEST_FLOW_PERF=y

CONFIG_RTE_APP_FLOW_PERF to follow naming conventions.

> diff --git a/doc/guides/tools/flow-perf.rst b/doc/guides/tools/flow-perf.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..30ce1b6cc0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/doc/guides/tools/flow-perf.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +..   SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +     Copyright 2020 Mellanox Technologies, Ltd
> +
> +RTE Flow performance tool
> +=========================
> +
> +Application for rte_flow performance testing.
> +
> +
> +Compiling the Application
> +=========================
> +The ``test-flow-perf`` application is compiled as part of the main 
> compilation
> +of the DPDK libraries and tools.
> +
> +Refer to the DPDK Getting Started Guides for details.
> +The basic compilation steps are:
> +
> +#. Set the required environmental variables and go to the source directory:
> +
> +     .. code-block:: console
> +
> +             export RTE_SDK=/path/to/rte_sdk
> +             cd $RTE_SDK
> +
> +#. Set the compilation target. For example:
> +
> +     .. code-block:: console
> +
> +             export RTE_TARGET=x86_64-native-linux-gcc
> +
> +#. Build the application:
> +
> +     .. code-block:: console
> +
> +             make install T=$RTE_TARGET
> +
> +#. The compiled application will be located at:
> +
> +     .. code-block:: console
> +
> +             $RTE_SDK/$RTE_TARGET/app/flow-perf
> +
> +
> +Running the Application
> +=======================
> +
> +EAL Command-line Options
> +------------------------
> +
> +Please refer to :doc:`EAL parameters (Linux) 
> <../linux_gsg/linux_eal_parameters>`
> +or :doc:`EAL parameters (FreeBSD) <../freebsd_gsg/freebsd_eal_parameters>` 
> for
> +a list of available EAL command-line options.
> +
> +
> +Flow performance Options
> +------------------------
> +
> +The following are the command-line options for the flow performance 
> application.
> +They must be separated from the EAL options, shown in the previous section, 
> with
> +a ``--`` separator:
> +
> +.. code-block:: console
> +
> +     sudo ./test-flow-perf -n 4 -w 08:00.0,dv_flow_en=1 --
> +
> +The command line options are:
> +
> +*    ``--help``
> +     Display a help message and quit.
> diff --git a/doc/guides/tools/index.rst b/doc/guides/tools/index.rst
> index 782b30864e..7279daebc6 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/tools/index.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/tools/index.rst
> @@ -16,3 +16,4 @@ DPDK Tools User Guides
>      cryptoperf
>      comp_perf
>      testeventdev
> +    flow-perf
> 

I think above should be alphabetically sorted as well.

Reply via email to