> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] > Sent: Monday, 10 March 2025 14.26 > > When freeing transmitted mbufs, there is no reason to send the freed > mbufs directly to the ring if the cache is empty - only if it is zero > size (in which case the cache pointer is NULL). Therefore, remove the > empty check and only check for a null cache pointer. > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/net/intel/common/tx.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/common/tx.h > b/drivers/net/intel/common/tx.h > index d9cf4474fc..d361fe64ab 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/intel/common/tx.h > +++ b/drivers/net/intel/common/tx.h > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ ci_tx_free_bufs_vec(struct ci_tx_queue *txq, > ci_desc_done_fn desc_done, bool ctx > void **cache_objs; > struct rte_mempool_cache *cache = > rte_mempool_default_cache(mp, rte_lcore_id()); > > - if (!cache || cache->len == 0) > + if (cache == NULL) > goto normal; > > cache_objs = &cache->objs[cache->len]; > -- > 2.43.0
Yep, it did look strange. Reviewed-by: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>