On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 04:18:35PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote: > > From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com] > > Sent: Monday, 10 March 2025 14.26 > > > > When freeing transmitted mbufs, there is no reason to send the freed > > mbufs directly to the ring if the cache is empty - only if it is zero > > size (in which case the cache pointer is NULL). Therefore, remove the > > empty check and only check for a null cache pointer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/intel/common/tx.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/common/tx.h > > b/drivers/net/intel/common/tx.h > > index d9cf4474fc..d361fe64ab 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/intel/common/tx.h > > +++ b/drivers/net/intel/common/tx.h > > @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ ci_tx_free_bufs_vec(struct ci_tx_queue *txq, > > ci_desc_done_fn desc_done, bool ctx > > void **cache_objs; > > struct rte_mempool_cache *cache = > > rte_mempool_default_cache(mp, rte_lcore_id()); > > > > - if (!cache || cache->len == 0) > > + if (cache == NULL) > > goto normal; > > > > cache_objs = &cache->objs[cache->len]; > > -- > > 2.43.0 > > Yep, it did look strange. > Reviewed-by: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com> > Thanks for review.
FYI: Given that this is in a sensitive area and we are now past rc2, I'm going to postponse merging this patch till 25.07, rather than risk it in 25.03. /Bruce
