>Acked-by: Chengwen Feng <fengcheng...@huawei.com> > Thomas,
Now that Feng Chengwen is ok with this change, can this be merged along with the ABI breaking changes in 25.11? Given that techboard approves the change. This change helps reduce ABI breakage when a new feature is added. Thanks, Pavan. >On 2025/7/25 14:04, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula wrote: >>>> Deprecate rte_dma_conf structure to allow for a more flexible >>>> configuration of DMA devices. >>>> The new structure will have a flags field instead of multiple >>>> boolean fields for each feature. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <mailto:pbhagavat...@marvell.com> >>>> --- >>>> +* dmadev: The ``rte_dma_conf`` structure is updated to include a new field >>>> + ``rte_dma_conf::flags`` that should be used to configure dmadev >>>> features. >>>> + The existing field ``rte_dma_conf::enable_silent`` is removed and >>>> replaced >>>> + with the new flag ``RTE_DMA_CFG_FLAG_SILENT``, to configure silent mode >>>> + the flag should be set in ``rte_dma_conf::flags`` during device >>>> configuration. >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Amit Prakash Shukla <amitpraka...@marvell.com> >>> >>> There is only 1 ack. >>> Per our policy, it will miss the release 25.07. >>> >>> You can probably do this change anyway, >>> and keep ABI compatibility by versioning the function. >> >> Hi Fengchengwen, >> >> Are you ok with this change? If so please ack it so that I can work on >> getting >> an exception from techboard to merge this without deprecation notice in >> 25.11. >> >> Thanks, >> Pavan. >>
