On Wed, 3 Jun 2026 at 17:56, Stephen Hemminger
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2026 12:01:48 +0200
> David Marchand <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Jun 2026 at 00:57, Stephen Hemminger
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > When using function versioning and building with Link Time Optimization,
> > > the compiler does not see the __asm__ annotation of symbols and
> > > therefore thinks there are two versions of the same symbol.
> > >
> > > The fix is to use compiler symver attribute on the function which
> > > was added in GCC 10. Keep the older method for backward compatibility
> > > with older compilers.
> > >
> > > Bugzilla ID: 1949
> > > Fixes: e30e194c4d06 ("eal: rework function versioning macros")
> >
> > We never used the symver stuff, so it seems unlikely the issue was
> > introduced with this rework.
> >
> > The fact that clang does not support this attribute is a concern.
>
> Clang doesn't have this problem. It works as is.

The Fixes: tag is wrong regardless.
The issue is probably present since introduction of the versioning
macros, or introduction of LTO in DPDK (not sure which came first).


> > > Cc: [email protected]
> >
> > Why do we need to backport?
>
> Well LTO has worked for a long time, it is not experimental just
> not commonly done since it takes so long to build.
>
> We were doing it years ago at MSFT.

Well, sorry, but every time I enable LTO, I end up with some warnings somewhere.
I don't think I am doing stuff really exotic though.

Looking at bugzilla, we had various fixes for LTO over the years.
We still have one open bz btw: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1709

Hence my feeling this feature is not something used by many people around.
And without a CI, we will keep on having to fix bugs/issues.


> > LTO is kind of experimental, so it seems good enough to reply "not
> > expected to work in older LTS" if someone reported an issue.
> >
> > And in practice, no LTS release call the versioning macros, since a
> > LTS drops all compatibility.

Just to be clear, we don't need fixing the macros in LTS: every time
we prepare a LTS rc0, we drop any kind of symbol compat.


> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
> >
> > I would like to reproduce, but I can't build main with LTO.
> > What patches did you apply locally to avoid warnings on the hash library?
> I use Debian testing and GCC 15 but shows up on older versions as well
> I get no warnings building main

Building from scratch, I do avoid the warnings I hit yesterday.

The fix looks correct, my problem is with the form.
Fixes: tags accuracy is important.
And I prefer we stick to "It is not broken, don't fix it".


Thanks.


>
>  $ git am 
> ~/Downloads/v2-ethdev-add-buffer-size-parameter-to-rte_eth_dev_get_name_by_port.patch
>  $ meson setup build-lto -Db_lto=true
>  $ ninja -C build-lto
> ninja: Entering directory `build-lto'
> [620/3781] Linking target lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2
> FAILED: [code=1] lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2
> cc  -o lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_ethdev_driver.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_ethdev_private.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_ethdev_profile.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_ethdev_trace_points.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_rte_class_eth.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_rte_ethdev.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_rte_ethdev_cman.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_rte_ethdev_telemetry.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_rte_flow.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_rte_mtr.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_rte_tm.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_sff_telemetry.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_sff_common.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_sff_8079.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_sff_8472.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_sff_8636.c.o 
> lib/librte_ethdev.so.26.2.p/ethdev_ethdev_linux_ethtool.c.o -flto=auto 
> -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined -Wl,-O1 -shared -fPIC 
> -Wl,-soname,librte_ethdev.so.26 -Wl,--no-as-needed -Wl,--undefined-version 
> -pthread -Wl,--start-group -lm -ldl -lnuma -lfdt '-Wl,-rpath,$ORIGIN/' 
> lib/librte_eal.so.26.2 lib/librte_kvargs.so.26.2 lib/librte_log.so.26.2 
> lib/librte_telemetry.so.26.2 lib/librte_argparse.so.26.2 
> lib/librte_net.so.26.2 lib/librte_mbuf.so.26.2 lib/librte_mempool.so.26.2 
> lib/librte_ring.so.26.2 lib/librte_meter.so.26.2 
> -Wl,--version-script=/home/shemminger/DPDK/lto/build-lto/lib/ethdev_exports.map
>  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbsd.so /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libarchive.so 
> -Wl,--end-group
> /tmp/cc3RQyqL.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/cc3RQyqL.s: Error: invalid attempt to declare external version name as 
> default in symbol `rte_eth_dev_get_name_by_port@@DPDK_27'
> make: *** [/tmp/ccVzgiZ2.mk:2: /tmp/ccTlGfA9.ltrans0.ltrans.o] Error 1
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> lto-wrapper: fatal error: make returned 2 exit status
> compilation terminated.
>


-- 
David Marchand

Reply via email to