> > >At this point we need to have only pseudo-header checksum for TSO. Maybe > there will be new requirements, but that's something I cannot predict at > this point. > > Ok great, then we'll add a patch for ENA for v14, unless you guys would > like to do it yourself. >
That'd be great! >We also need to deliver a fix for issue we found during investigation of > tx_prep() API. > > Not sure what you are talking about... > Is that some separate issue not related directly to tx_prepare()? > Yes, this is something not related, but came up during investigation of tx_prepare(), so this is an additional benefit of this topic :-) Thanks Jan