2016-12-08 10:56, Aaron Conole: > It's been a source of confusion in the past, and even with this update > may continue to be a source of confusion. However, the original > language seems to imply that the DPDK EAL will take ownership of the > array passed in. Loosening the language up a bit might give a better > understanding for what is actually happening. > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <acon...@redhat.com>
Applied, thanks
