Le 13/01/2017 à 19:32, Ferruh Yigit a écrit :
Please aware VFD is an EXPERIMENTAL feature, it can be changed or even
removed without prior notice.
So new version sent with a experimental tag, this can provide some
flexibility to the feature until proper DPDK PF discussion concluded.
Is there any objection to the patchset with experimental tag?
Hi Vincent,
Can this be interim solution until your concerns addressed?
If so, I will proceed working on getting patch into next-net.
I agree that the experimental status is a better option. It shall remain
experimental till both:
a- we agree that DPDK could be used as a PF, which I do not believe
is a good option, it has been argued within previous email, but let's
keep thinking about it ;
b- assuming a-, the kernel includes exactly the same definition of
messages+features for its PF.
The VF messages and PF messages shall remain with the experimental
status for any x message that is not supported by the kernel's PF.
The PF side of the DPDK implementation may be removed some days.
Series-Acked-By: Vincent Jardin <vincent.jar...@6wind.com>
