2016-11-11 04:49, Tan, Jianfeng: > Hi Thomas and Konrad, > > On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan: > >>> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to > >>> continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the > >>> maintainer of all xen-related files. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng....@intel.com> > >> Applied > >> > >> Please Jianfeng, could you start your new role by sending a status > >> of Xen dom0 support in DPDK? I think there are some issues in latest > >> releases. > > Yes, I'm on this. And hope to send out update in the next week. > > > Pls also CC me and xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org if possible. > > Glad to do that. > > Thanks, > Jianfeng
Any news about Xen dom0 status in DPDK? I think there is not enough interest for Xen dom0 in the DPDK community. Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not fixed yet: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044207.html http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044376.html The request (6 month ago) was to give more time for feedbacks: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044847.html Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support?