HI Fiona 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Verma, Shally
>Sent: 12 January 2018 19:24
>To: 'Trahe, Fiona' <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Gupta, Ashish <ashish.gu...@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila 
><sunila.s...@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal
><mahipal.cha...@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad 
><narayanaprasad.athr...@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
><pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.j...@intel.com>; 
>Roy Pledge <roy.ple...@nxp.com>; Youri Querry
><youri.querr...@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Ahmed 
>Mansour <ahmed.mans...@nxp.com>; De Lara
>Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>
>Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
>
>Hi Fiona
>
>> I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the 
>> maintainers about getting one set up.
>Sure. Please share us details when it is available. I assume it will be 
>created once API spec move from RFC to 1st version?
>
[Shally] Any update on this? We're available with sample SW ZLIB based 
implementation (currently proof-concepted for stateless only) . So, if any repo 
is available, we can upload it there.

>Thanks
>Shally
>
>From: Trahe, Fiona [mailto:fiona.tr...@intel.com]
>Sent: 12 January 2018 00:31
>To: Verma, Shally <shally.ve...@cavium.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Gupta, Ashish <ashish.gu...@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila 
><sunila.s...@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal
><mahipal.cha...@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad 
><narayanaprasad.athr...@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
><pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.j...@intel.com>; 
>Roy Pledge <roy.ple...@nxp.com>; Youri Querry
><youri.querr...@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Ahmed 
>Mansour <ahmed.mans...@nxp.com>; Trahe,
>Fiona <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo 
><pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>
>Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
>
>Hi Shally,
>
>
>From: Verma, Shally [mailto:shally.ve...@cavium.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:33 AM
>To: Trahe, Fiona <mailto:fiona.tr...@intel.com>; mailto:dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Gupta, Ashish <mailto:ashish.gu...@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila 
><mailto:sunila.s...@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal
><mailto:mahipal.cha...@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad 
><mailto:narayanaprasad.athr...@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch,
>Pablo <mailto:pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K 
><mailto:deepak.k.j...@intel.com>; Roy Pledge
><mailto:roy.ple...@nxp.com>; Youri Querry <mailto:youri.querr...@nxp.com>; 
>Hemant Agrawal
><mailto:hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour <mailto:ahmed.mans...@nxp.com>
>Subject: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
>
>Hi Fiona
>
>We are planning to implement ZLIB based SW PMD to proof-concept DPDK 
>compression RFC v3 API spec internally. However, would
>like to check
>If you're working upon similar in parallel and if yes, then what's your 
>development roadmap / strategy so that we could see if we
>could leverage joint effort.
>Depending upon your feedback, we can see if we can have some common repo for 
>joint development or send it as RFC patch.
>
>Let me know your opinion on same.
>[Fiona] We have not started a zlib based SW PMD, and would be delighted if you 
>would do this, I agree it's a
>good way to prove out the API.
>We are writing some unit tests against the API, we would be happy to share 
>these with you, and continue to develop these
>jointly so the same test sets can be targeted against all PMDs.
>I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the 
>maintainers about getting one set up.
>
>Thanks
>Shally

Reply via email to