HI Fiona >-----Original Message----- >From: Verma, Shally >Sent: 12 January 2018 19:24 >To: 'Trahe, Fiona' <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org >Cc: Gupta, Ashish <ashish.gu...@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila ><sunila.s...@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal ><mahipal.cha...@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad ><narayanaprasad.athr...@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo ><pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.j...@intel.com>; >Roy Pledge <roy.ple...@nxp.com>; Youri Querry ><youri.querr...@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Ahmed >Mansour <ahmed.mans...@nxp.com>; De Lara >Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com> >Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD > >Hi Fiona > >> I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the >> maintainers about getting one set up. >Sure. Please share us details when it is available. I assume it will be >created once API spec move from RFC to 1st version? > [Shally] Any update on this? We're available with sample SW ZLIB based implementation (currently proof-concepted for stateless only) . So, if any repo is available, we can upload it there.
>Thanks >Shally > >From: Trahe, Fiona [mailto:fiona.tr...@intel.com] >Sent: 12 January 2018 00:31 >To: Verma, Shally <shally.ve...@cavium.com>; dev@dpdk.org >Cc: Gupta, Ashish <ashish.gu...@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila ><sunila.s...@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal ><mahipal.cha...@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad ><narayanaprasad.athr...@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo ><pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.j...@intel.com>; >Roy Pledge <roy.ple...@nxp.com>; Youri Querry ><youri.querr...@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Ahmed >Mansour <ahmed.mans...@nxp.com>; Trahe, >Fiona <fiona.tr...@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo ><pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com> >Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD > >Hi Shally, > > >From: Verma, Shally [mailto:shally.ve...@cavium.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:33 AM >To: Trahe, Fiona <mailto:fiona.tr...@intel.com>; mailto:dev@dpdk.org >Cc: Gupta, Ashish <mailto:ashish.gu...@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila ><mailto:sunila.s...@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal ><mailto:mahipal.cha...@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad ><mailto:narayanaprasad.athr...@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, >Pablo <mailto:pablo.de.lara.gua...@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K ><mailto:deepak.k.j...@intel.com>; Roy Pledge ><mailto:roy.ple...@nxp.com>; Youri Querry <mailto:youri.querr...@nxp.com>; >Hemant Agrawal ><mailto:hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour <mailto:ahmed.mans...@nxp.com> >Subject: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD > >Hi Fiona > >We are planning to implement ZLIB based SW PMD to proof-concept DPDK >compression RFC v3 API spec internally. However, would >like to check >If you're working upon similar in parallel and if yes, then what's your >development roadmap / strategy so that we could see if we >could leverage joint effort. >Depending upon your feedback, we can see if we can have some common repo for >joint development or send it as RFC patch. > >Let me know your opinion on same. >[Fiona] We have not started a zlib based SW PMD, and would be delighted if you >would do this, I agree it's a >good way to prove out the API. >We are writing some unit tests against the API, we would be happy to share >these with you, and continue to develop these >jointly so the same test sets can be targeted against all PMDs. >I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the >maintainers about getting one set up. > >Thanks >Shally