Hi Shally, > -----Original Message----- > From: Verma, Shally [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 11:27 AM > To: Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: Gupta, Ashish <[email protected]>; Sahu, Sunila > <[email protected]>; Challa, Mahipal <[email protected]>; > Athreya, Narayana Prasad <[email protected]>; De Lara > Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>; Jain, Deepak K > <[email protected]>; Roy Pledge <[email protected]>; Youri > Querry <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > <[email protected]>; Ahmed Mansour > <[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD ><[email protected]>; Roy Pledge <[email protected]>; Youri > >Querry <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > ><[email protected]>; Ahmed Mansour > <[email protected]>; De > >Lara Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]> > >Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD > > > >Hi Fiona > > > >> I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to > the maintainers about getting one set up. > >Sure. Please share us details when it is available. I assume it will be > >created > once API spec move from RFC to 1st version? > > > [Shally] Any update on this? We're available with sample SW ZLIB based > implementation (currently proof-concepted for stateless only) . So, if any > repo is available, we can upload it there.
We are working towards getting final internal approvals and will have more info. on this early next week. > > >Thanks > >Shally > > > >From: Trahe, Fiona [mailto:[email protected]] > >Sent: 12 January 2018 00:31 > >To: Verma, Shally <[email protected]>; [email protected] > >Cc: Gupta, Ashish <[email protected]>; Sahu, Sunila > ><[email protected]>; Challa, Mahipal > <[email protected]>; > >Athreya, Narayana Prasad <[email protected]>; De > Lara > >Guarch, Pablo <[email protected]>; Jain, Deepak K > ><[email protected]>; Roy Pledge <[email protected]>; Youri > >Querry <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > ><[email protected]>; Ahmed Mansour > <[email protected]>; Trahe, > >Fiona <[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > ><[email protected]> > >Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD > > > >Hi Shally, > > > > > >From: Verma, Shally [mailto:[email protected]] > >Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:33 AM > >To: Trahe, Fiona <mailto:[email protected]>; mailto:[email protected] > >Cc: Gupta, Ashish <mailto:[email protected]>; Sahu, Sunila > ><mailto:[email protected]>; Challa, Mahipal > ><mailto:[email protected]>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad > ><mailto:[email protected]>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo > ><mailto:[email protected]>; Jain, Deepak K > ><mailto:[email protected]>; Roy Pledge > ><mailto:[email protected]>; Youri Querry > ><mailto:[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > ><mailto:[email protected]>; Ahmed Mansour > ><mailto:[email protected]> > >Subject: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD > > > >Hi Fiona > > > >We are planning to implement ZLIB based SW PMD to proof-concept DPDK > >compression RFC v3 API spec internally. However, would like to check If > >you're working upon similar in parallel and if yes, then what's your > >development roadmap / strategy so that we could see if we could leverage > joint effort. > >Depending upon your feedback, we can see if we can have some common > repo for joint development or send it as RFC patch. > > > >Let me know your opinion on same. > >[Fiona] We have not started a zlib based SW PMD, and would be delighted > >if you would do this, I agree it's a good way to prove out the API. > >We are writing some unit tests against the API, we would be happy to > >share these with you, and continue to develop these jointly so the same > test sets can be targeted against all PMDs. > >I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to > the maintainers about getting one set up. > > > >Thanks > >Shally
