On 06-Apr-18 1:01 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2018 7:43 PM
To: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.j...@nxp.com>
Cc: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>; email@example.com;
ys...@mellanox.com; peppe...@japf.ch; jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com;
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; olivier.m...@6wind.com;
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/68] Memory Hotplug for DPDK
05/04/2018 16:24, Shreyansh Jain:
Physical addressing cases for both, dpaa/dpaa2, depend heavily on
the fact that physical addressing was the base and was available in
sorted manner. This is reversed/negated with hotplugging support.
So, rework of both the drivers is required from this perspective.
There are some suggestions floated by Anatoly and internally, but
work still needs to be done.
It also impacts a lot of use-cases for virtualization (no-iommu).
So what is your recommendation?
Can you rework PA case in dpaa/dpaa2 drivers within 18.05 timeframe?
We will like 2-3 more days on this before we can ack/nack this patch.
We are working on priority on this. PA case rework is not a trivial change.
The patch is good to go. However, we will be making changes in dpaa/dpaa2
drivers to fix the PA issues shortly (within 18.05 timeframe)
That's great to hear!
Anatoly needs to take care of following:
1. Comment by Shreyansh on " Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 50/68] eal: replace memzone
array with fbarray"
Yes, that is already fixed in both github and upcoming v4.
2. I could not apply the patches cleanly on current master.
The patchset has dependencies, listed in the cover letter. I'll rebase
on latest master before sending v4 just in case.
Tested-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>