I prefer one field. Otherwise, the dialogs that jira shows don't have the field that we need showing frequently (since it is a custom field, the dialogs would need to be updated but that isn't something we can do ourselves. (This is why, after adding the target version field, we stopped using it.)
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Steven Phillips <sphill...@maprtech.com> wrote: > I think there should just be one field. While the work is in progress, it > represents the target version, and if the work is complete, it represents > the fix version. I don't really see the point in having a "target" version > once it is fixed. > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Chris Westin <chriswesti...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Right. I'd like to use Target Version for when we'd like to have it fixed > > by, and Fix Version for when it actually got fixed. > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Parth Chandra <pchan...@maprtech.com> > > wrote: > > > > > It seems to me that we have been using Fix Version when we probably > mean > > > Target Version. > > > > > > The JIRA create issue dialog has this: > > > > > > Target Version: The versions where this patch is intended to be > > committed. > > > Use "Fix Version" to note where it actually has been committed. > > > > > > Perhaps we should start using the correct field? > > > > > > > > > -- > Steven Phillips > Software Engineer > > mapr.com >
