+1 on this proposal. On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Edmon Begoli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Got it. Makes sense. > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On (3), my thought is that they plan on commencing in the next couple > > weeks, (not that they have to complete by then). The fix for tag tells > > others how long they it will take. If someone wants it faster, they > should > > chime in to help out. > > > > -- > > Jacques Nadeau > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Edmon Begoli <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > > > I would only comment that we should probably relax item 3 to tie the > > > commitment to the release schedule. > > > There might be issues that cannot be worked on within few weeks, but > are > > > good to keep planned for the future few releases ahead. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey Everybody, > > > > > > > > As more and more people are starting to work on JIRAs, I'd like to > > > propose > > > > a new process around jira assignment, targeting, etc. This way people > > > will > > > > be able to more easily identify available issues for pick up and > > general > > > > development intentions. > > > > > > > > I propose the following: > > > > > > > > 1. We should remove the default assignment of new issues. > > > > 2. We need to remove all current assignments other than those that > > are > > > > currently active (or about to be active). > > > > 3. Individual developers who plan to work on a feature should > assign > > > it > > > > to themselves. This should be a commitment to work on this feature > > > > within > > > > the next couple weeks. (They should also set the "fix for" to the > > > > release > > > > they would like to target completion.) > > > > 4. Once a developer starts work on a feature, they should accept > the > > > > feature (showing that they are actively working on it). > > > > 5. If another developer is interested in working on a feature that > > is > > > > assigned (but inactive), they should request taking over that > > feature > > > > from > > > > the current assignee. > > > > > > > > How does this sound? > > > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > > > -- Kamesh.
