+1

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Kamesh <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 on this proposal.
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Edmon Begoli <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Got it. Makes sense.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On (3), my thought is that they plan on commencing in the next couple
> > > weeks, (not that they have to complete by then). The fix for tag tells
> > > others how long they it will take. If someone wants it faster, they
> > should
> > > chime in to help out.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jacques Nadeau
> > > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Edmon Begoli <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sounds good to me.
> > > >
> > > > I would only comment that we should probably relax item 3 to tie the
> > > > commitment to the release schedule.
> > > > There might be issues that cannot be worked on within few weeks, but
> > are
> > > > good to keep planned for the future few releases ahead.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey Everybody,
> > > > >
> > > > > As more and more people are starting to work on JIRAs, I'd like to
> > > > propose
> > > > > a new process around jira assignment, targeting, etc. This way
> people
> > > > will
> > > > > be able to more easily identify available issues for pick up and
> > > general
> > > > > development intentions.
> > > > >
> > > > > I propose the following:
> > > > >
> > > > >    1. We should remove the default assignment of new issues.
> > > > >    2. We need to remove all current assignments other than those
> that
> > > are
> > > > >    currently active (or about to be active).
> > > > >    3. Individual developers who plan to work on a feature should
> > assign
> > > > it
> > > > >    to themselves. This should be a commitment to work on this
> feature
> > > > > within
> > > > >    the next couple weeks. (They should also set the "fix for" to
> the
> > > > > release
> > > > >    they would like to target completion.)
> > > > >    4. Once a developer starts work on a feature, they should accept
> > the
> > > > >    feature (showing that they are actively working on it).
> > > > >    5. If another developer is interested in working on a feature
> that
> > > is
> > > > >    assigned (but inactive), they should request taking over that
> > > feature
> > > > > from
> > > > >    the current assignee.
> > > > >
> > > > > How does this sound?
> > > > >
> > > > > Jacques
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Kamesh.
>

Reply via email to