I think the temporary- concept seems like a simple solution. You want to propose on that other thread so I can +1?
-- Jacques Nadeau CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Nov 5, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'm not sure what to do here. INFRA just changed the Git behavior so it > is > > no longer possible to delete branches. I generally don't like to have > > failed branches in a release history (otherwise you get a release branch > > with all these maven forward/backwards commits). As such, I would > overwrite > > candidate branches historically (dropping the failed release commits). > > (Moving to a new thread to as not to hijack the VOTE thread.) > > I am wresting with the same problem with Calcite. I wonder whether we > should ask INFRA to treat branches called ‘temporary-…’ differently. > > Julian > >
