There’s no other thread, since David Nalley’s email was sent to a Bcc: list, but I’ve sent him an email and copied you (Jacques) on it.
> On Nov 5, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the temporary- concept seems like a simple solution. You want to > propose on that other thread so I can +1? > > -- > Jacques Nadeau > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> On Nov 5, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I'm not sure what to do here. INFRA just changed the Git behavior so it >> is >>> no longer possible to delete branches. I generally don't like to have >>> failed branches in a release history (otherwise you get a release branch >>> with all these maven forward/backwards commits). As such, I would >> overwrite >>> candidate branches historically (dropping the failed release commits). >> >> (Moving to a new thread to as not to hijack the VOTE thread.) >> >> I am wresting with the same problem with Calcite. I wonder whether we >> should ask INFRA to treat branches called ‘temporary-…’ differently. >> >> Julian >> >>
