Everybody should pick their ten favorites using the numbers 1 to 10. 10 is most preferred
-- Jacques Nadeau CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Single vote for most preferred? > > Single transferable vote? > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> > wrote: > >> Given that a bunch of people added names to the sheet, I'll take that as >> tacit agreement to the proposed process. >> >> Let's move to the first vote phase. I've added a column for everybody's >> votes. Let's try to wrap up the vote by 10am on Wednesday. >> >> thanks! >> Jacques >> >> >> >> -- >> Jacques Nadeau >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey Guys, >>> >>> It sounds like we need to do a little more work on the Vector proposal >>> before the board would like to consider it. The main point of contention >>> right now is the name of the project. We need to decide on a name and get >>> it signed off through PODLINGNAMESEARCH. >>> >>> Naming is extremely subjective so I'd like to propose a process for >>> selection that minimizes pain. This is an initial proposal and >>> >>> We do the naming in the following steps >>> - 1: Collect a set of names to be considered >>> - 2: Run a vote for 2 days where each member ranks their top 10 options >>> 1..10 >>> - 3: Take the top ten vote getters and do a basic analysis of whether we >>> think that any have legal issues. Keep dropping names that have this >>> until >>> we get with 10 reasonably solid candidate names >>> - 5: Take the top ten names and give people 48 hours to rank their top 3 >>> names >>> - 6: Start a PODLINGNAMESEARCH on the top rank one, if that doesn't work, >>> try the second and third options. >>> >>> I suggest we take name suggestions for step 1 from everyone but then >>> constrain the voting to the newly proposed project [1]. We could just do >>> this in a private email thread but I think doing it on Drill dev is >>> better >>> in the interest of transparency. This isn't the perfect place for that >>> but >>> I'm not sure a better place exists. >>> >>> I'm up for changing any or all of this depending on what others think. >>> Just >>> wanted to get the ball rolling on a proposed process. >>> >>> If this works, I've posted a doc at [2] that we can use for step 1. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jacques >>> >>> [1] List of proposed new project members/voters: Todd Lipcon, Ted >>> Dunning, >>> Michael Stack, P. Taylor Goetz, Julian Hyde, Julien Le Dem, Jacques >>> Nadeau, >>> James Taylor, Jake Luciani, Parth Chandra, Alex Levenson, Marcel >>> Kornacker, >>> Steven Phillips, Hanifi Gunes, Wes McKinney, Jason Altekruse, David >>> Alves, >>> Zain Asgar, Ippokratis Pandis, Abdel Hakim Deneche, Reynold Xin. >>> [2] >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q6UqluW6SLuMKRwW2TBGBzHfYLlXYm37eKJlIxWQGQM/edit#gid=0 >>> >> >> >
