On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> wrote:
> Ok guys, > > I don't think anyone is doing a thorough analysis of viaability. I did a > quick glance and the top one (Vector) seems like it would have an issue > with conflict of an Actian product. The may be fine. Let's do a second > phase vote. > I'm assuming you mean Vectorwise? Before we do anything else, could we have a lawyer look into this? Last time around that I remember (Parquet), Twitter's lawyers did a good job of weeding out the potential trademark violations. Alex, could Twitter get involved this time around as well? > > Pick your top 3 (1,2,3 with 3 being top preference) > > Let's get this done by Friday and then we can do a podling name search > starting with the top one. > > Link again: > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q6UqluW6SLuMKRwW2TBGBzHfYLlXYm37eKJlIxWQGQM/edit#gid=304381532&vpid=A1 > > thanks > > > -- > Jacques Nadeau > CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> > wrote: > >> Ok, it looks like we have a candidate list (we actually got 11 since >> there was a three-way tie for ninth place): >> >> VectorArrowhoneycombHerringbonejoistV2Pietcolbufbatonimpulsevictor >> Next we need to do trademark searches on each of these to see whether >> we're likely to have success. I've moved candidates to a second tab: >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q6UqluW6SLuMKRwW2TBGBzHfYLlXYm37eKJlIxWQGQM/edit#gid=304381532 >> >> Anybody want to give a hand in analyzing potential conflicts? >> >> >> >> -- >> Jacques Nadeau >> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Everybody should pick their ten favorites using the numbers 1 to 10. >>> >>> 10 is most preferred >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jacques Nadeau >>> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Single vote for most preferred? >>>> >>>> Single transferable vote? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@dremio.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Given that a bunch of people added names to the sheet, I'll take that >>>>> as tacit agreement to the proposed process. >>>>> >>>>> Let's move to the first vote phase. I've added a column for >>>>> everybody's votes. Let's try to wrap up the vote by 10am on Wednesday. >>>>> >>>>> thanks! >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jacques Nadeau >>>>> CTO and Co-Founder, Dremio >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hey Guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> It sounds like we need to do a little more work on the Vector proposal >>>>>> before the board would like to consider it. The main point of >>>>>> contention >>>>>> right now is the name of the project. We need to decide on a name and >>>>>> get >>>>>> it signed off through PODLINGNAMESEARCH. >>>>>> >>>>>> Naming is extremely subjective so I'd like to propose a process for >>>>>> selection that minimizes pain. This is an initial proposal and >>>>>> >>>>>> We do the naming in the following steps >>>>>> - 1: Collect a set of names to be considered >>>>>> - 2: Run a vote for 2 days where each member ranks their top 10 >>>>>> options >>>>>> 1..10 >>>>>> - 3: Take the top ten vote getters and do a basic analysis of whether >>>>>> we >>>>>> think that any have legal issues. Keep dropping names that have this >>>>>> until >>>>>> we get with 10 reasonably solid candidate names >>>>>> - 5: Take the top ten names and give people 48 hours to rank their >>>>>> top 3 >>>>>> names >>>>>> - 6: Start a PODLINGNAMESEARCH on the top rank one, if that doesn't >>>>>> work, >>>>>> try the second and third options. >>>>>> >>>>>> I suggest we take name suggestions for step 1 from everyone but then >>>>>> constrain the voting to the newly proposed project [1]. We could just >>>>>> do >>>>>> this in a private email thread but I think doing it on Drill dev is >>>>>> better >>>>>> in the interest of transparency. This isn't the perfect place for >>>>>> that but >>>>>> I'm not sure a better place exists. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm up for changing any or all of this depending on what others >>>>>> think. Just >>>>>> wanted to get the ball rolling on a proposed process. >>>>>> >>>>>> If this works, I've posted a doc at [2] that we can use for step 1. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] List of proposed new project members/voters: Todd Lipcon, Ted >>>>>> Dunning, >>>>>> Michael Stack, P. Taylor Goetz, Julian Hyde, Julien Le Dem, Jacques >>>>>> Nadeau, >>>>>> James Taylor, Jake Luciani, Parth Chandra, Alex Levenson, Marcel >>>>>> Kornacker, >>>>>> Steven Phillips, Hanifi Gunes, Wes McKinney, Jason Altekruse, David >>>>>> Alves, >>>>>> Zain Asgar, Ippokratis Pandis, Abdel Hakim Deneche, Reynold Xin. >>>>>> [2] >>>>>> >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q6UqluW6SLuMKRwW2TBGBzHfYLlXYm37eKJlIxWQGQM/edit#gid=0 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
