+1 (non-binding) Built from source and successfully ran unit tests. Ran both in embedded and distributed mode. Verified DRILL-4972 / DRILL-4964 Ran some basic query on sys tables and sample data.
Looks good. On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Krystal Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > Built from source. Tested the WebUI including authentication. Tested > sqlline. > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Paul Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > Built from source > > Ran script unit tests to verify config settings, etc. > > > > Looks good. > > > > - Paul > > > > > On Nov 16, 2016, at 1:46 PM, Robert Hou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Built from source. > > > Tested parquet filter pushdown. > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Karthikeyan Manivannan < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> +1 > > >> > > >> Built from source. > > >> Ran tests in embedded mode to verify the fix for DRILL-4974. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Parth Chandra <[email protected] > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1 (binding) > > >>> > > >>> Checked the source and binary signatures. > > >>> Built from source. > > >>> Ran a few hundred queries against Parquet files. > > >>> Built C++ client. Ran a bunch of queries. > > >>> > > >>> All looks good. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Chunhui Shi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > > >>>> 1, clone branch from https://github.com/sudheeshkatkam/drill/ > > >>>> <https://github.com/sudheeshkatkam/drill/commits/drill-1.9.0> > switch > > >> to > > >>>> drill-1.9.0 branch > > >>>> 2, built drill from source with unit tests. All passes > > >>>> 3, check git-properties > > >>>> 4, run embedded mode and verify some parquet and native reader > default > > >>>> values in sys.options. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:20 PM, rahul challapalli < > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> +1 (Non-Binding) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 1. Downloaded and built drill from source > > >>>>> 2. Ran functional tests [1], and Advanced tests [2]. > > >>>>> 3. Ran some simple queries on INFORMATION_SCHEMA and sys tables > > >>>>> 4. Tried out a few legacy udf's developed prior to Drill-1.0 > > >>>>> 5. Sanity tested cancellation of running queries > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [1] > > >>>>> https://github.com/mapr/drill-test-framework/tree/master/ > > >>>>> framework/resources/Functional > > >>>>> [2] > > >>>>> https://github.com/mapr/drill-test-framework/tree/master/ > > >>>>> framework/resources/Advanced > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Sudheesh Katkam < > > >>> [email protected]> > > >>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The vote ends tomorrow at 6:30 PM PT; please vote! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> As of now, there are only two binding votes. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Thank you, > > >>>>>> Sudheesh > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Nov 14, 2016, at 7:51 AM, Dechang Gu <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> - build from source > > >>>>>>> - deployed on a cluster > > >>>>>>> - run TPCH and TPCDS SF100 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> LGTM. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -Dechang > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Aman Sinha < > > >> [email protected]> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> +1 (binding) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> - Downloaded the binaries on my mac, verified README, > > >>> git.properties > > >>>>> and > > >>>>>>>> KEYS file GPG key > > >>>>>>>> - Ran several queries, including CTAS against TPC-H data. > > >> Checked > > >>>>>> Explain > > >>>>>>>> plans and results for a few queries. > > >>>>>>>> - Checked Web UI for query profiles. > > >>>>>>>> - Downloaded source on my Linux VM, did a build and ran unit > > >> tests > > >>>>>>>> successfully. > > >>>>>>>> - Checked Maven artifacts on repositories.apache.org > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -Aman > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Khurram Faraaz < > > >>>>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Built from source without unit tests. > > >>>>>>>>> deployed binaries on a cluster. > > >>>>>>>>> executed some basic SQL queries (like aggregation, joins, range > > >>>>> search > > >>>>>>>> etc) > > >>>>>>>>> from sqlline. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> looks good to me. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Sudheesh Katkam < > > >>>>> [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I would like to propose the second release candidate (RC1) of > > >>>> Apache > > >>>>>>>>> Drill, > > >>>>>>>>>> version 1.9.0. Thanks to everyone who contributed to this > > >>> release! > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> + Compared to RC0, this release candidate does not contain > > >>>>> DRILL-4373, > > >>>>>>>>> due > > >>>>>>>>>> to a regression (DRILL-5034). > > >>>>>>>>>> + The release candidate covers a total of 73 resolved JIRAs > > >> [1]. > > >>>>>>>>>> + The tarball artifacts are hosted at [2], and the maven > > >>> artifacts > > >>>>> are > > >>>>>>>>>> hosted at [3]. > > >>>>>>>>>> + This release candidate is based on commit > > >>>>>>>>>> db3085498c2dc481f734733535c877dfffb9afea located at [4]. > > >>>>>>>>>> + The artifacts are signed with the key at [5]. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> The vote ends at 6:30 PM PT, November 16th, 2016. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Here's my vote: +1 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thank you, > > >>>>>>>>>> Sudheesh > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> [1] > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > > >>>>>>>>>> projectId=12313820&version=12337861 > > >>>>>>>>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~sudheesh/drill/releases/1.9.0/ > > >>> rc1/ > > >>>>>>>>>> [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > >>>>>>>>>> orgapachedrill-1038/ > > >>>>>>>>>> [4] https://github.com/sudheeshkatkam/drill/commits/ > > >> drill-1.9.0 > > >>>>>>>>>> [5] https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/sudheesh.asc > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > -- Thanks, Sorabh
