Github user sachouche commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/1072#discussion_r162121115
  
    --- Diff: 
exec/java-exec/src/main/java/org/apache/drill/exec/expr/fn/impl/SqlPatternContainsMatcher.java
 ---
    @@ -19,44 +19,286 @@
     
     import io.netty.buffer.DrillBuf;
     
    -public class SqlPatternContainsMatcher extends AbstractSqlPatternMatcher {
    +/** SQL Pattern Contains implementation */
    +public final class SqlPatternContainsMatcher extends 
AbstractSqlPatternMatcher {
    +  private final MatcherFcn matcherFcn;
     
       public SqlPatternContainsMatcher(String patternString) {
         super(patternString);
    +
    +    // Pattern matching is 1) a CPU intensive operation and 2) pattern and 
input dependent. The conclusion is
    +    // that there is no single implementation that can do it all well. So, 
we use multiple implementations
    +    // chosen based on the pattern length.
    +    if (patternLength == 0) {
    +      matcherFcn = new MatcherZero();
    +    } else if (patternLength == 1) {
    +      matcherFcn = new MatcherOne();
    +    } else if (patternLength == 2) {
    +      matcherFcn = new MatcherTwo();
    +    } else if (patternLength == 3) {
    +      matcherFcn = new MatcherThree();
    +    } else if (patternLength < 10) {
    +      matcherFcn = new MatcherN();
    +    } else {
    +      matcherFcn = new BoyerMooreMatcher();
    +    }
       }
     
       @Override
       public int match(int start, int end, DrillBuf drillBuf) {
    +    return matcherFcn.match(start, end, drillBuf);
    +  }
    +
    +  
//--------------------------------------------------------------------------
    +  // Inner Data Structure
    +  // 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
    +
    +  /** Abstract matcher class to allow us pick the most efficient 
implementation */
    +  private abstract class MatcherFcn {
    +    protected final byte[] patternArray;
    +
    +    protected MatcherFcn() {
    +      assert patternByteBuffer.hasArray();
    +
    +      patternArray = patternByteBuffer.array();
    +    }
    +
    +    /**
    +     * @return 1 if the pattern was matched; 0 otherwise
    +     */
    +    protected abstract int match(int start, int end, DrillBuf drillBuf);
    +  }
    +
    +  /** Handles patterns with length one */
    +  private final class MatcherZero extends MatcherFcn {
     
    -    if (patternLength == 0) { // Everything should match for null pattern 
string
    +    private MatcherZero() {
    +    }
    +
    +    /** {@inheritDoc} */
    +    @Override
    +    protected final int match(int start, int end, DrillBuf drillBuf) {
           return 1;
         }
    +  }
    +
    +  /** Handles patterns with length one */
    +  private final class MatcherOne extends MatcherFcn {
    +
    +    private MatcherOne() {
    +      super();
    +    }
    +
    +    /** {@inheritDoc} */
    +    @Override
    +    protected final int match(int start, int end, DrillBuf drillBuf) {
    +      final int lengthToProcess = end - start;
    +      final byte firstPattByte  = patternArray[0];
    --- End diff --
    
    renamed all such variables to XXXPatternBytes


---

Reply via email to