+1

I just learned to ignore the ancient PRs; they were not adding much value.

If a PR looks like it could be resurrected, we might consider 1) assigning a 
committer to help push it over the line, and 2) check back with submitter to 
see if they can update it.

We tried the above a few times over the last couple of years and were able to 
finish a couple of otherwise-stale PRs.

Thanks,
- Paul

 

    On Thursday, May 31, 2018, 2:35:25 PM PDT, Timothy Farkas 
<[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 Hi All,

There are a lot of open PRs. I think it would be good to close some of them in 
order to identify the remaining PRs that require action to be taken. 
Specifically I was thinking of first closing obsolete PRs and then see how far 
that takes us. A PR could be considered obsolete if it is:


  *  Changing code or documentation that no longer exists.
  *  Adding documentation that is no longer correct.
  *  Has a note already on the PR that it needs to be closed because another PR 
was opened.


Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Tim  

Reply via email to