Sure, we can discuss it during Hangout.
Sorabh, since you are latest release manager, I am wondering if you would 
volunteer to add scripts into Drill project? :)
At least something to start with.

Kind regards,
Arina

> On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:32 PM, SorabhApache <sor...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1 for including release scripts. I would also recommend adding a README.md
> in the same location, which can include link to a wiki for the release
> process or all the instructions in it. Also it would be great if we can
> formulate some guidelines as to what kind of issues may not be considered
> as blocker for a release going forward. May be we can discuss in the next
> hangout as well.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sorabh
> 
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 8:03 AM Aman Sinha <amansi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> +1 on including the release preparation script into the code base. Location
>> TBD.  Perhaps under a separate 'release' subdirectory either in contrib or
>> docs ?
>> 
>> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:46 AM Arina Yelchiyeva <
>> arina.yelchiy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Maybe we should include these scripts directly into Drill project (of
>>> course if Parth does not mind), maybe in doc module?
>>> This way we will be able to modify them if needed using regular PR
>> process
>>> and everybody will know where to find them.
>>> 
>>> Any thoughts?
>>> 
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Arina
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 1:56 AM, SorabhApache <sor...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Update:
>>>> DRILL-7201 / DRILL-7202: Kunal has fixes for both and are
>>> ready-to-commit.
>>>> DRILL-7213: drill-format-mapr.jar contains stale git.properties file
>>>> 
>>>>  - The main issue here was that in 1.14 and 1.15 drill-format-mapr.jar
>>>>  was included with release tarballs where it shouldn't be. So Vova
>>> helped to
>>>>  make a change in 1.16 to fix that and now format-mapr will not be
>>> included
>>>>  in release tarballs, not any mapr specific jars. The PR is approved
>> and
>>>>  ready-to-commit.
>>>> 
>>>> DRILL-7212: Add gpg key with apache.org email for sorabh
>>>> 
>>>>  - PR is opened for it. I have added both my emails to the gpg key and
>>> is
>>>>  signed by boaz.
>>>> 
>>>> DRILL-7207: Update the copyright year in NOTICE.txt file
>>>> 
>>>>  - PR is opened for this as well.
>>>> 
>>>> Last issue which Vova reported about files like
>>>> 
>>> 
>> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler1256088670033285178arguments*
>>>> being included in jar. This was present in 1.14 as well but not in
>> 1.15.
>>>> The reason is it looks like different processes are followed for
>> release.
>>>> Every release done using the script (drill-release.sh)[1] will have
>> above
>>>> file. The reason is because the *mvn release:prepare* phase is done
>> with
>>> -X
>>>> flag which creates debug files and those are not excluded from
>> maven-jar
>>>> plugin configuration. After removing the -X option I am not seeing
>> above
>>>> files anymore and speed of prepare phase is increased significantly as
>>>> well. Will submit a separate PR for this change in script post release.
>>>> 
>>>> Once all the changes are merged into master, I will re-prepare the RC
>>>> candidate and share with the community.
>>>> 
>>>> [1]: https://github.com/parthchandra/stuff/tree/master/scripts
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sorabh
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 3:02 PM Kunal Khatua <ku...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> UPDATE:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Both, DRILL-7201 and DRILL-7202 has been fixed and verified by Sorabh
>>>>> and Arina, so we can have it as part of "RC2".
>>>>> 
>>>>> (Thanks for catching the issues, Arina ! )
>>>>> 
>>>>> ~ kunal
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 4/25/2019 4:12:16 AM, Volodymyr Vysotskyi <volody...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Sorabh,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have noticed that jars in prebuild tar contain some strange files,
>> for
>>>>> example, *drill-jdbc-all-1.16.0.jar* contains the following files:
>>>>> *javac.sh*
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler1256088670033285178arguments*
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler1458111453480208588arguments*
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler2392560589194600493arguments*
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler4475905192586529595arguments*
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler4524532450095901144arguments*
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler4670895443631397937arguments*
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler5215058338087807885arguments*
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler7526103232425779297arguments*
>>>>> 
>>>>> which contain some info about your machine (username, etc.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jars from the previous release didn't contain these files. Also, I
>> have
>>>>> built master on my machine and these files are absent for me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Could you please take a look? This problem is observed for both RCs.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 8:20 AM SorabhApache wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Update:
>>>>>> 1) DRILL-7208 is there in 1.15 release as well, so it's not a blocker
>>> for
>>>>>> 1.16
>>>>>> 2) DRILL-7213: drill-format-mapr.jar contains stale git.properties
>> file
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Still investigating on the above issue.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 3) DRILL-7201: Strange symbols in error window (Windows)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Issue is not reproducible on Kunal's machine. He is having
>> discussion
>>>>>> on JIRA to see if it's treated as a blocker or not.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> To investigate for DRILL-7213 I have to drop the RC1 candidate since
>>>>> again
>>>>>> performing the release required to push it to my remote repo and
>>> publish
>>>>> to
>>>>>> maven repo as well. So I don't have RC1 binaries if we consider all
>> the
>>>>>> issues as non-blocking.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I will re-share the RC candidate once either fix for
>>>>> DRILL-7213/DRILL-7201
>>>>>> are available or it's considered as non-blockers. Any thoughts?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Sorabh
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:17 PM Boaz Ben-Zvi wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Downloaded both the binary and src tarballs, and verified the SHA
>>>>>>> signatures and the PGP.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Built and ran the full unit tests on both Linux and Mac (took 3:05
>>>>> hours
>>>>>>> on my Mac).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Successfully ran some old favorite queries with
>>> Sort/Hash-Join/Hash-Agg
>>>>>>> spilling.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Ran several manual tests of REFRESH METADATA with COLUMNS, and
>>> verified
>>>>>>> the metadata files and summaries.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Noticed that when specifying a COLUMN which a sub-field in a complex
>>>>>>> type (e.g., a key in a map), the whole column (i.e. all the other
>> keys
>>>>>>> as well) was marked as "interesting"; but this may be "by design",
>> as
>>>>>>> the refresh granularity is the whole column.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Also noticed the sys.version issue (DRILL-7208
>>>>>>> ) - should be minor as
>>>>>>> only affecting users of the SRC tarball, likely developers who
>>>>>>> build/modify the code anyway.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hence my vote is +1 .
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- Boaz
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 4/24/19 10:57 AM, Kunal Khatua wrote:
>>>>>>>> Downloaded the tarball and tried it in embedded mode.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Ran simple join queries and interacted with the WebUI.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Issues confirmed were DRILL-7192 and DRILL-7203.
>>>>>>>> I'm unable to repro DRILL-7201 and DRILL-7202, though I have a fix
>>>>> for
>>>>>>> the latter. Will work with Arina to identify repro steps.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> None of these are blockers IMO, so I'll vote +1.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ~ Kunal
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 4/24/2019 10:38:31 AM, Khurram Faraaz wrote:
>>>>>>>> i see the correct version and commit, I deployed the binaries to
>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Apache Drill 1.16.0
>>>>>>>> "Start your SQL engine."
>>>>>>>> apache drill> select * from sys.version;
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> +---------+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
>>>>>>>> | version | commit_id |
>>>>>>>> commit_message | commit_time |
>>>>>>>> build_email | build_time |
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> +---------+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
>>>>>>>> | 1.16.0 | cf5b758e0a4c22b75bfb02ac2653ff09415ddf53 |
>>>>>>>> [maven-release-plugin] prepare release drill-1.16.0 | 22.04.2019 @
>>>>>>> 09:08:36
>>>>>>>> PDT | sor...@apache.org | 22.04.2019 @ 09:53:25 PDT |
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> +---------+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
>>>>>>>> 1 row selected (0.274 seconds)
>>>>>>>> apache drill>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Khurram
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:52 AM SorabhApache wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi Volodymyr/Anton,
>>>>>>>>> I can verify that I am seeing both the below issues as reported by
>>>>>> Anton
>>>>>>>>> and Volodymyr. I will investigate further why we are seeing these
>>>>>>> issues.
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for catching this. Can you please open JIRA's for these
>>>>> issues
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 1) Wrong result for sys.version query when built from source
>>>>> tarball.
>>>>>>>>> 2) git.properties file in drill-format-mapr-1.16.0.jar has wrong
>>>>>> commit
>>>>>>> id
>>>>>>>>> but as Volodymyr mentioned because of order in which jars are
>> picked
>>>>>> up
>>>>>>>>> it's not showing the issue when tried from prebuilt tarball.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> @Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>>>>>>>>> Regarding the GPG key I am not sure if we mandate it to use
>>>>>> apache.org,
>>>>>>>>> there other keys in the file which are using gmail address as
>> well.
>>>>> As
>>>>>>> far
>>>>>>>>> as the signing person is authenticating the key and details
>>>>> associated
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> it, I think it should be fine. But since it's recommended I will
>> use
>>>>>>>>> apache.org email address instead.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Sorabh
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 8:53 AM Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Aman,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> There are two different issues connected with *git.properties*
>>>>> file.
>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the problem I have mentioned, prebuilt tar
>>>>>>>>>> (apache-drill-1.16.0.tar.gz) contains
>>>>> *drill-format-mapr-1.16.0.jar*
>>>>>>> jar
>>>>>>>>>> which contains a *git.properties* file with the incorrect
>> version.
>>>>>>>>>> When *select * from sys.version* query is submitted, class loader
>>>>>> finds
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> first file named as *git.properties* from the classpath (each
>> drill
>>>>>> jar
>>>>>>>>>> contains its own *git.properties* file) and for my case file from
>>>>>>>>>> *drill-format-mapr-1.16.0.jar *is picked up, so the incorrect
>>>>> result
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> returned. But it may not be reproducible for other machines since
>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> depends on the order of files for the class loader.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Regarding the problem Anton has mentioned, Drill should be built
>>>>> from
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> sources (apache-drill-1.16.0-src.tar.gz), and for that version,
>>>>>>> *select *
>>>>>>>>>> from sys.version* returns the result without information about
>>>>>> commit.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 6:33 PM Aman Sinha wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> This works fine for me with the binary tarball that I installed
>> on
>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>> Mac.
>>>>>>>>>>> ..it shows the correct commit message.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Drill 1.16.0
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> "This isn't your grandfather's SQL."
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> apache drill> *select* * *from* sys.version;
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> +---------+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
>>>>>>>>>>> | version | commit_id |
>>>>>>>>>>> commit_message | commit_time |
>>>>>>>>>>> build_email | build_time |
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> +---------+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
>>>>>>>>>>> | 1.16.0 | cf5b758e0a4c22b75bfb02ac2653ff09415ddf53 |
>>>>>>>>>>> [maven-release-plugin] prepare release drill-1.16.0 |
>> 22.04.2019 @
>>>>>>>>>> 09:08:36
>>>>>>>>>>> PDT | sor...@apache.org | 22.04.2019 @ 09:54:09 PDT |
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> +---------+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't see any extraneous git.properties anywhere in the source
>>>>>>>>>>> distribution that I downloaded:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> [root@aman1 apache-drill-1.16.0-src]# find . -name
>>>>> "git.properties"
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> ./distribution/target/apache-drill-1.16.0/apache-drill-1.16.0/git.properties
>>>>>>>>>>> ./git.properties
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:51 AM Arina Ielchiieva
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Taking into account previous emails, looks like we'll need to
>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>> RC.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I also suggest to include
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7201
>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>> new RC.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arina
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 2:44 PM Volodymyr Vysotskyi <>
>>>>>>>>>>> volody...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, I have noticed that for the prebuilt tar, the following
>>>>>> query
>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> machine returns the wrong results:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache drill> select * from sys.version;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> +---------+------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | version | commit_id |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit_message | commit_time
>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> build_email | build_time |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> +---------+------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>> | 1.16.0 | b3db1ff4b0d29210593c4485125578cca7a64b42 |
>>>>> DRILL-7188:
>>>>>>>>>>> Revert
>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-6642: Update protocol-buffers version | 21.04.2019 @
>>>>>> 15:35:28
>>>>>>>>>>> PDT |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sor...@apache.org | 22.04.2019 @ 09:07:35 PDT |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> +---------+------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 row selected (1.318 seconds)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The root cause for this problem is that
>>>>>>>>> drill-format-mapr-1.16.0.jar
>>>>>>>>>>> jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains git.properties file with incorrect version, and this
>>>>> file
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> first one which was found by the class loader.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this is a blocker for the release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 2:31 PM Anton Gozhiy
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clarification to my last message:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded Drill from here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> http://home.apache.org/~sorabh/drill/releases/1.16.0/rc1/apache-drill-1.16.0-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and built it by command:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn clean install -DskipTests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 1:53 PM Anton Gozhiy <>
>>>>>>>>> anton5...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found an issue with Drill version, used the provided rc1
>>>>>>>>>> source:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache drill> select * from sys.version;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> +---------+-----------+----------------+-------------+-------------+------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | version | commit_id | commit_message | commit_time |
>>>>>>>>>> build_email
>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build_time |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> +---------+-----------+----------------+-------------+-------------+------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | 1.16.0 | Unknown | | | Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> +---------+-----------+----------------+-------------+-------------+------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Although there is a valid git.properties file in the Drill
>>>>> root
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #Generated by Git-Commit-Id-Plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #Mon Apr 22 09:52:07 PDT 2019
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.branch=cf5b758e0a4c22b75bfb02ac2653ff09415ddf53
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.build.host=SHamirw-E755.local
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.build.time=22.04.2019 @ 09\:52\:07 PDT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.build.user.email=sor...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.build.user.name=Sorabh Hamirwasia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.build.version=1.16.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.closest.tag.commit.count=0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.closest.tag.name=drill-1.16.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.id=cf5b758e0a4c22b75bfb02ac2653ff09415ddf53
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.id.abbrev=cf5b758
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.id.describe=drill-1.16.0-0-gcf5b758
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.id.describe-short=drill-1.16.0-0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.message.full=[maven-release-plugin] prepare
>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drill-1.16.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.message.short=[maven-release-plugin] prepare
>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drill-1.16.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.time=22.04.2019 @ 09\:08\:36 PDT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.user.email=sor...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.user.name=Sorabh Hamirwasia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.dirty=false
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.remote.origin.url=https\://github.com/apache/drill.git
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.tags=drill-1.16.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.total.commit.count=3568
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But looks like it doesn't get into the classpath.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone take a look into this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:50 AM Volodymyr Vysotskyi <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volody...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sorabh,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for being picky, but looks like the key you have
>>>>>>>>> published
>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated for non-apache email: sohami.apa...@gmail.com.
>>>>>>>>>>> According
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], it is highly recommended to use Apache email address
>> as
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> primary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> User-ID.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#user-id
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:10 AM Jyothsna Reddy <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jyothsna....@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Built it from cloning the git branch and unit tests on my
>>>>>>>>>> Linux
>>>>>>>>>>> VM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken - 43 min).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tested new features of metadata caching by creating v4
>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new Refresh Metadata commands and manually verified the
>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>> files.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tried
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a few queries that use metadata cache and verified
>> results.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release looks good to me +1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jyothsna
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sender
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notified by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 04/24/19,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12:09:52 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:09 AM Jyothsna Reddy <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jyothsna....@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Built it from cloning the git branch and unit tests on my
>>>>>>>>>>> Linux
>>>>>>>>>>>> VM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken - 43 min).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tested new features of metadata caching by creating v4
>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new Refresh Metadata commands and manually verified the
>>>>>>>>>> cache
>>>>>>>>>>>>> files.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tried
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a few queries that use metadata cache and verified
>>>>>>>>> results.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did a few manual tests with REFRESH METADATA by creating
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> V4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release looks good to me +1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jyothsna
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:56 PM Sorabh Hamirwasia <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shamirwa...@mapr.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Volodymyr,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The KEYS file on svn will be updated when a release
>>>>>>>>>> candidate
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approved
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and all the artifacts are copied to the svn.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE is not updated per release so I won't treat it as
>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be good to add it in the wiki below to ensure from next
>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> onwards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For release I am following this wiki[1] which is part of
>>>>>>>>>>>> Parth's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository. I will update it to include both the steps
>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/parthchandra/drill/wiki/Drill-Release-Process
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorabh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:19 PM Volodymyr Vysotskyi <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volody...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorabh, could you please add your key to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/drill/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>> file?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure that it is a blocker, but the year in NOTICE
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have any guides for basic checks for release? If
>>>>>>>>>> no,
>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to introduce such a list of things to check for the
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:09 PM Aman Sinha <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amansi...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Downloaded source tarball on my Linux VM and built
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> ran
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully (elapsed time 46 mins).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Downloaded binary tarball on my Mac and ran in
>>>>>>>>>> embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Verified Sorabh's release signature using gpg
>>>>>>>>> --verify
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checked the maven artifacts are published
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checked Ran a few queries against TPC-DS SF1 and
>>>>>>>>>> examined
>>>>>>>>>>>>> query
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> profiles
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Web UI. Looked good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did a few manual tests with REFRESH METADATA by
>>>>>>>>>> creating
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> V4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata cache and checked EXPLAIN plans and query
>>>>>>>>>>> results.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Found an issue with control-c handling and filed
>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7198
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noted in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the JIRA that I don't think it is a blocker.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall, release looks good ! +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:01 AM SorabhApache <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sor...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Aman and Volodymyr for discussing on this
>>>>>>>>>> issue.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clarify
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the thread that RC1 still stands as valid, since
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> issue
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anymore.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 9:18 AM Volodymyr
>>>>>>>>> Vysotskyi <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volody...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discussed with Aman and concluded that this issue
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 6:39 PM Aman Sinha <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amansi...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Vova,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added some thoughts in the DRILL-7195 JIRA.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 6:06 AM Volodymyr
>>>>>>>>>>> Vysotskyi <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volody...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did some checks and found the following
>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7195 <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7195>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7194 <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7194>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7192 <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7192>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of them (DRILL-7194) is also reproduced
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another is connected with the new feature
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (DRILL-7192),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that we should treat them as blockers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The third one (DRILL-7195) is a regression
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong results, so I think that it should be
>>>>>>>>>> fixed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 8:58 PM SorabhApache
>>>>>>>>> <>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sor...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *< please="" disregard="" previous="" email,="">
>>>>>> one=""
>>>>>>> of="">
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Use the information in this email instead
>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Drillers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to propose the second release
>>>>>>>>>>> candidate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (RC1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Drill,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version 1.16.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes since the previous release
>>>>>>>>> candidate:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7185: Drill Fails to Read Large
>>>>>>>>> Packets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7186: Missing storage.json REST
>>>>>>>>>> endpoint
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7190: Missing backward compatibility
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>> REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> API
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-6562
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also below 2 JIRA's were created to
>>>>>>>>>> separately
>>>>>>>>>>>>> track
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protbuf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes in 1.16.0:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7188: Revert DRILL-6642: Update
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protocol-buffers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7189: Revert DRILL-7105 Error while
>>>>>>>>>>>> building
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Drill
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> native
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RC1 includes total of 215 resolved
>>>>>>>>> JIRAs
>>>>>>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to everyone for their hard work to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> contribute
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The tarball artifacts are hosted at [2] and
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> maven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifacts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hosted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at [3].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This release candidate is based on commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cf5b758e0a4c22b75bfb02ac2653ff09415ddf53
>>>>>>>>>>> located
>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please download and try out the release
>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote ends at 06:00 PM UTC (11:00 AM
>>>>>>>>> PDT,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 09:00
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EET,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:30
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IST),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apr 25th, 2019
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is my vote: +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313820&version=12344284
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~sorabh/drill/releases/1.16.0/rc1/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedrill-1067/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/sohami/drill/commits/drill-1.16.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorabh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely, Anton Gozhiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anton5...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely, Anton Gozhiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anton5...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Reply via email to